Thanks Dongjoon for initiating this discussion.
I think the current release cadence is great, 1-2 years for a major release
and we maintain each major release for about 3 years so we can make sure we
maintain a consistent number of releases.
guiyanakuang commented on pull request #941:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/941#issuecomment-949070074
@dongjoon-hyun Sorry for the late reply. This pr is ready to review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
That's a good question. I asked the same question in April by myself. :)
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r84e4e575dd7414921aadee1df116e0e900fb1e000919e921a0d08993%40%3Cdev.orc.apache.org%3E
Apache ORC will follow `Semantic Versioning` like many other Apache
projects.
https://semver.org
Thanks Dongjoon for initiating this.
I wanted to include the release policy into this discussion as that will
influence what kind of cadence we might need.
I would like to understand the differentiation between a Patch Release X.Y.Z
and a Minor Release X.Y.
Are there any scenarios where a
pavibhai commented on a change in pull request #924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/924#discussion_r733860985
##
File path: java/core/src/java/org/apache/orc/impl/RecordReaderUtils.java
##
@@ -414,7 +414,15 @@ static void readRanges(FSDataInputStream file,
long
dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/924#issuecomment-948766538
Gentle ping, @omalley . How do you want to proceed this PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #941:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/941#issuecomment-948725592
Thank you for updating. Is this ready for review, @guiyanakuang ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
