## Description:
The mission of ORC is the creation and maintenance of software related
to the smallest, fastest columnar storage for Hadoop workloads.
## Issues:
There are no issues requiring board attention.
## Membership Data:
Apache ORC was founded 2015-04-21 (7 years ago)
There are currently
Hi, All.
Thanks to William and Yiqun. We verified and fixed them.
It seems that we need to release Apache ORC 1.6.14 together.
Let me prepare it after 1.7.4 release.
For the ORC Board Report, I'll finalize and send it with those updates.
Thanks,
Dongjoon
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 1:26 PM
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #1080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1080#issuecomment-1088283283
Thank sounds better.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #1075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/issues/1075#issuecomment-1088282881
If you get the results, please share them to the dev mailing list,
@williamhyun .
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #1075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/issues/1075#issuecomment-1088274728
I also quickly re-checked the Iceberg test. So, `TestMetricsRowGroupFilter`
passed except the following one mentioned by @guiyanakuang .
```
shouldRead =
guiyanakuang commented on PR #1080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1080#issuecomment-1088267454
> Oh, @guiyanakuang . This is not correct, @guiyanakuang .
>
> There exists multiple NaN values. Double.NaN is just one of them.
Maybe I should use the JDK's own method `new
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #1080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1080#issuecomment-1088257901
Please note that IEEE Standard defines NaN as range, not a single value.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
dongjoon-hyun merged PR #1078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1078
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
guiyanakuang opened a new pull request, #1080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1080
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is aimed at using `Objects.equals(dstas.getSum(), Double.NaN)`
instead of `isFinite` to determine if there is a NaN write.
Yiqun Zhang created ORC-1147:
Summary: Use `Objects.equals(dstas.getSum(), Double.NaN)` instead
of `isFinite` to determine if there is a NaN write
Key: ORC-1147
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC-1147
dongjoon-hyun merged PR #1079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1079
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dongjoon-hyun opened a new pull request, #1079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1079
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a backport of ORC-1016 because `branch-1.6` seems to hit this issue
in the following PR.
-
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #1078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1078#issuecomment-1088210328
cc @guiyanakuang . This will be merged with your authorship after passing
CIs.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
dongjoon-hyun opened a new pull request, #1078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1078
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is aimed at checking whether the float category statistic sum has a
finite value.
### Why are the changes needed?
williamhyun commented on issue #1075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/issues/1075#issuecomment-1088209651
Thank you @guiyanakuang !
I am retesting on both Iceberg and Spark.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #1077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1077#issuecomment-1088207106
Thank you, @guiyanakuang .
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
guiyanakuang commented on PR #1077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1077#issuecomment-1088196218
Thanks @dongjoon-hyun . I checked the branch-1.6 and confirmed it has the
same problem. This pr can just cherry pick and fix it without any conflicts.
--
This is an automated message
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #1073:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1073#issuecomment-1088162263
Oh, that looks like a good improvement item in Java.
Could you please file a JIRA for that if we don't have it yet, @coderex2522 ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #1077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1077#issuecomment-1087846051
BTW, @guiyanakuang . Could you check branch-1.6 too when you have a time? We
backported the following in branch-1.6. I guess we might have the same issue
there.
-
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #1077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1077#issuecomment-1087834344
I deleted my previous comment about the branch-1.7 test result.
At a clean build, I verified this patch in branch-1.7 and backported. Thank
you again, @guiyanakuang .
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #1077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1077#issuecomment-1087819831
Hi, @guiyanakuang .
- Could you make a backporting patch to branch-1.7, please?
- This works in `main` branch but not in `branch-1.7`. We need to pass CI.
--
This is an
dongjoon-hyun closed pull request #1077: ORC-1146: Float category missing check
if the statistic sum is a finite value
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1077
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #1076:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1076#issuecomment-1087767116
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next
major or minor version, let me
dongjoon-hyun closed pull request #1076: Bump netty-all from 4.1.68.Final to
4.1.75.Final in /java
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1076
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #1075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/issues/1075#issuecomment-1087744468
Oh, thank you, @guiyanakuang !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
guiyanakuang opened a new pull request, #1077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1077
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is aimed at checking whether the float category statistic sum has a
finite value.
### Why are the changes needed?
Yiqun Zhang created ORC-1146:
Summary: Float category does not check if the statistic sum is a
finite value
Key: ORC-1146
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC-1146
Project: ORC
Issue
guiyanakuang commented on issue #1075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/issues/1075#issuecomment-1087526984
Thanks to capturing these failed tests, @williamhyun
I conducted some investigation.
Prior to #1055, it was just coincidence that these tests would pass, after
#1055 was fixed
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1076:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1076
Bumps [netty-all](https://github.com/netty/netty) from 4.1.68.Final to
4.1.75.Final.
Commits
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5f1802ac65d63076616c5b3ee7a3d4151c7f3414;>5f1802a
coderex2522 commented on PR #1073:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1073#issuecomment-1087315808
> BTW, do we have a similar code in Java side, @coderex2522 ?
I've looked at the SargApplier java code in the RecordReaderImpl.java file
and it doesn't implement filtering based on
30 matches
Mail list logo
