>
> By the way, when using Flatbuffers, I would suggest that you
> optionally call Flatbuffers verification when benchmarking the parsing
> routine.
Good point, I do this by default. The numbers quoted above
include verification.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 5:44 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed,
jorisvandenbossche commented on code in PR #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/34#discussion_r1636023227
##
content/en/docs/File Format/implementationstatus.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+---
+title: "Implementation status"
+linkTitle: "Implementation status"
+weigh
Hey Gang,
I think it would be great to get these fixes out to the public. This will
also ensure that we can include Parquet 1.14.1 into Iceberg. I don't have
any fixes that can go in, so from my end, we're good for starting the
release process.
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op di 4 jun 2024 om 09:03 schre
Thanks Rok for the update!
Yes, the copied issues look good to me. Perhaps we need a separate
vote for non-parquet-cpp repos before the action.
Best,
Gamg
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:40 AM Rok Mihevc wrote:
> I have set up a script for the parquet-cpp migration (and also for
> migration of othe
> Perhaps we need a separate vote for non-parquet-cpp repos before the
action.
Agreed. Did we discuss this enough to call for a vote yet?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 5:23 PM Gang Wu wrote:
> Thanks Rok for the update!
>
> Yes, the copied issues look good to me. Perhaps we need a separate
> vote for
+1 on renaming to “rows”
--
Best Regards,
Muhammad Haseeb
From: Antoine Pitrou
Date: Monday, June 3, 2024 at 8:30 AM
To: d...@parquet.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Unify Record / Row terminology (to Row)
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On Fri, 31 May 20
IMO, we'd better start a separate discussion to dev@parquet ML
as the original discussion contains a lot of stuff and I didn't see
enough Parquet PMCs to reply to this topic.
Best,
Gang
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:01 AM Rok Mihevc wrote:
> > Perhaps we need a separate vote for non-parquet-cpp rep
Thanks Fokko!
I'll start the release process today.
Best,
Gang
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:48 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> Hey Gang,
>
> I think it would be great to get these fixes out to the public. This will
> also ensure that we can include Parquet 1.14.1 into Iceberg. I don't have
> any fix
Hi everyone,
I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache
Parquet-Java 1.14.1 release.
The commit id is 97ede968377400d1d79e3196636ba3de392196ba
* This corresponds to the tag: apache-parquet-1.14.1-rc0
*
https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/tree/97ede968377400d1d79e3196636ba
