+1 (binding)
Gang Wu ezt írta (időpont: 2024. jún. 14., P, 4:00):
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Gang
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 2:26 AM Ed Seidl wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Ed
> >
> > On 6/13/24 11:20 AM, Micah Kornfield wrote:
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun
Hi Rok,
Thanks for working on this!
* The mapping is perfect. There are some components which were deprecated
and then removed, including parquet-cascading, but they were part of
parquet-mr.
* I would agree these labels do not seem to be very useful. On the other
hand, we are migrating all the jir
+1 (binding)
Uwe L. Korn ezt írta (időpont: 2024. jún. 13., Cs,
16:49):
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, at 4:42 PM, Micah Kornfield wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding) rom me
> >
> > On Thursday, June 13, 2024, Gang Wu wrote:
> >
> >> +1 on this
> >>
> >> BTW, I created following PRs to enabl
emkornfield commented on code in PR #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/34#discussion_r1639298560
##
content/en/docs/File Format/implementationstatus.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+---
+title: "Implementation status"
+linkTitle: "Implementation status"
+weight: 8
+-
+1 (binding)
Best,
Gang
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 2:26 AM Ed Seidl wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks!
> Ed
>
> On 6/13/24 11:20 AM, Micah Kornfield wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 11:14 AM Rok Mihevc
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Following the ML discussion [
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks!
Ed
On 6/13/24 11:20 AM, Micah Kornfield wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 11:14 AM Rok Mihevc wrote:
Hi all,
Following the ML discussion [1] I would like to propose a vote for
parquet-java, parquet-format, parquet-testing and parquet-site issues to be
I'll start a vote thread but would still welcome any feedback.
It would also be nice to confirm the following:
* is the component-to-repo mapping ok as proposed (e.g.
jira/parquet-cascading --> github/parquet-java)
* do we want to keep old labels? they were not used much in Jira see label
counts
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 11:14 AM Rok Mihevc wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the ML discussion [1] I would like to propose a vote for
> parquet-java, parquet-format, parquet-testing and parquet-site issues to be
> moved from Parquet Jira [2] to respective GitHub issue trackers. If
Hi all,
Following the ML discussion [1] I would like to propose a vote for
parquet-java, parquet-format, parquet-testing and parquet-site issues to be
moved from Parquet Jira [2] to respective GitHub issue trackers. If the
vote passes parquet-format, parquet-java and parquet-testing issue trackers
Maybe we should just start the vote?
On Thursday, June 13, 2024, Julien Le Dem wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 4:49 PM Uwe L. Korn wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, at 4:42 PM, Micah Kornfield wrote:
> > > +1 (non-binding) rom me
> > >
> > > On Thursday,
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 4:49 PM Uwe L. Korn wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, at 4:42 PM, Micah Kornfield wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding) rom me
> >
> > On Thursday, June 13, 2024, Gang Wu wrote:
> >
> >> +1 on this
> >>
> >> BTW, I created following PRs to enable github
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, at 4:42 PM, Micah Kornfield wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) rom me
>
> On Thursday, June 13, 2024, Gang Wu wrote:
>
>> +1 on this
>>
>> BTW, I created following PRs to enable github issues to these repos:
>> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/255
>> - ht
+1 (non-binding) rom me
On Thursday, June 13, 2024, Gang Wu wrote:
> +1 on this
>
> BTW, I created following PRs to enable github issues to these repos:
> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/255
> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/1362
> - https://github.com/apache/parqu
+1 on this
BTW, I created following PRs to enable github issues to these repos:
- https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/255
- https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/1362
- https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/50
I will not merge them until the formal vote passes.
Best,
Ga
Thanks! I made a PR recently[1] to update the terminology in the thrift
definitions. If you know of other places it is inconsistent please let me
know and I will update it there too.
Andrew
[1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/256
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:09 PM Muhammad Haseeb
wr
Hi all,
Discussing migration of parquet-cpp issues into Arrow's GitHub issue
tracker [1] produced the idea of moving other parquet tickets into GitHub
issue trackers as well.
Since parquet-format, parquet-site and parquet-testing separate repos,
issues related to them should probably be moved into
+1 (binding).
Ran unitests
Cheers, Gidon
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 11:45 AM Gábor Szádovszky wrote:
> Checked tarball content, signature and checksum. Executed unit tests. All
> pass.
> +1 (binding)
>
> Gang Wu ezt írta (időpont: 2024. jún. 13., Cs, 8:43):
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I propose t
Checked tarball content, signature and checksum. Executed unit tests. All
pass.
+1 (binding)
Gang Wu ezt írta (időpont: 2024. jún. 13., Cs, 8:43):
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache
> Parquet-Java 1.14.1 release.
>
> The commit id is 97ede96837740
18 matches
Mail list logo
