For anyone that didn't see the [RESULT] thread [1], this vote has passed.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/odm5pmxssyd9kw1wvgdkg8hd044czqnk
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 7:01 AM Uwe L. Korn wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023, at 5:49 AM, Daniel Weeks wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 6,
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Oct 7, 2023, at 5:49 AM, Daniel Weeks wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023, 8:33 PM Gang Wu wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Best,
>> Gang
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 11:05 AM Micah Kornfield
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm +1 (non-binding) for the proposal in general.
>> >
>> > I d
+1
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023, 8:33 PM Gang Wu wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Gang
>
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 11:05 AM Micah Kornfield
> wrote:
>
> > I'm +1 (non-binding) for the proposal in general.
> >
> > I do have a concern that we should be implementing
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Gang
On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 11:05 AM Micah Kornfield
wrote:
> I'm +1 (non-binding) for the proposal in general.
>
> I do have a concern that we should be implementing
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2182 (ignoring stats for
> logical types the reader doesn
I'm +1 (non-binding) for the proposal in general.
I do have a concern that we should be implementing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2182 (ignoring stats for
logical types the reader doesn't understand) and its equivalent in other
libraries first, but given potential low usage we can
+1
About the naming. We already use INT_8, INT_16 etc. for logical types for
integer values. What do you think about FLOAT_16 to be consistent?
Cheers,
Gabor
On 2023/10/05 22:17:13 Ryan Blue wrote:
> +1
>
> I'm all for adding a 2-byte floating point representation since even 4-byte
> floats a
+1
I'm all for adding a 2-byte floating point representation since even 4-byte
floats are quite expensive to store.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 1:43 PM Xinli shang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 1:32 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > +1 from me (non-binding).
> >
> > Regards
+1
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 1:32 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> +1 from me (non-binding).
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:14:00 -0400
> Ben Harkins
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I would like to propose adding a half-precision floating point type to
> > the Parq
Hello,
+1 from me (non-binding).
Regards
Antoine.
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:14:00 -0400
Ben Harkins
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to propose adding a half-precision floating point type to
> the Parquet format specification, in accordance with the active
> proposal here:
>
>
>-
Hi everyone,
I would like to propose adding a half-precision floating point type to
the Parquet format specification, in accordance with the active
proposal here:
- https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/184
To summarize, the current proposal would introduce a Float16 logical
type, re
10 matches
Mail list logo