I just noticed a problem: this includes a compile dependency on slf4j-nop.
We shouldn't release with a dependency that could throw away logs if it
ends up in the classpath, so I'm going to cancel this vote to fix the
problem.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Daniel Weeks
wrote:
> +1
>
> Reviewe
+1
Reviewed, Built, Verified Checksums
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> +1
>
> Checked build, RAT, checksums.
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache Parquet
> > Format 2.4.
+1
Checked build, RAT, checksums.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache Parquet
> Format 2.4.0 release.
>
> The commit id is 3fb6b391db7f369de8b4114ae071f5725db7247c
>
>- This corresponds to the tag:
Hi everyone,
I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache Parquet Format
2.4.0 release.
The commit id is 3fb6b391db7f369de8b4114ae071f5725db7247c
- This corresponds to the tag: apache-parquet-format-2.4.0
- https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/tree/3fb6b39
-
http
