[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14259344#comment-14259344
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PDFBOX-2576:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14259346#comment-14259346
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PDFBOX-2576:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14259349#comment-14259349
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PDFBOX-2576:
-
Commit
Hi All,
I’ve been looking at the Matrix class and trying to understand if it has some
problems. The Matrix class
in PDFBox uses the following matrix:
| sx hy 0 |
| hx sy 0 |
| tx ty 1 |
In a PDF file this matrix is represented as the 6-element array [a, b, c, d, e,
f] where the meaning of
the
The best way to prove or falsify this theory would be to create a PDF
that uses the cm operator, but has different values for hy and hx, and
then render the image with PDFBox.
Or render PDF files and see what happens... I just changed that method,
and get several differences in the
Hi,
I tried the following with skew being [1 tan a tan b 1 0 0] according to the
spec.
Matrix matrix = new Matrix();
which gives me [1.0,0.0,0.0,1.0,0.0,0.0]
then
matrix.setValue(0, 1, 0.5f);
matrix.setValue(1, 0, 0.7f);
which shall set the tan a and tan b values
which gave me
Yes, the pure matrix code seems to work fine. As do the examples which Tilman
mentioned. I can’t find any issue with the code itself. However, we make use
the following Matrix method:
public AffineTransform createAffineTransform()
{
AffineTransform retval = new AffineTransform(
