[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Lehmkühler resolved PDFBOX-5683.
Resolution: Fixed
set to resolved
> Inconsistent/incomplete PDF rendering
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Lehmkühler resolved PDFBOX-5696.
Resolution: Fixed
[~tilman] Thanks for the feedback, set to resolved
> COSStream
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tilman Hausherr closed PDFBOX-5698.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
No it's not and there are no plans at this time.
> [Question] Is True
XMP, incremental versions record keeping, 2.0 features sound interesting
to me.
My thoughts are mostly about existing issues... these are the ones that
people have spoken out about.
Tilman
On 11.10.2023 07:53, sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote:
Dear colleagues,
with 3.0 being released and 4.0 b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17775183#comment-17775183
]
Tilman Hausherr commented on PDFBOX-5695:
-
These guards should only be used when
On 11.10.2023 07:53, sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote:
With regards to versioning I'd like to propose that we have 2.0 as LTS
and 4.x being the next LTS.
Yes, very good idea.
Tilman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfb
Am Samstag, dem 14.10.2023 um 13:36 +0200 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
> On 11.10.2023 07:53, sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote:
> > With regards to versioning I'd like to propose that we have 2.0 as
> > LTS
> > and 4.x being the next LTS.
although both projects can not be compared maybe we can adopt some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17775271#comment-17775271
]
Andreas Lehmkühler commented on PDFBOX-5699:
[~rombert] sorry, but I don't g
