[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13947938#comment-13947938 ]
Nicolas Bouillon commented on PDFBOX-2001: ------------------------------------------ In the following source, line 447 : http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pdfbox/tags/1.8.4/pdfbox/src/main/java/org/apache/pdfbox/cos/COSDocument.java?view=markup#l447 There is a test for the value COSName.SIG. It's not related ? > Digital Signature information > ----------------------------- > > Key: PDFBOX-2001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2001 > Project: PDFBox > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.8.3 > Reporter: Nicolas Kaczmarski > Attachments: D.1_signiert.pdf, acrobatSignatureExample.PNG > > > We have a signed PDF but signature is described without key "Sig". > As you can see in the standard PDF 32000-1:2008 - Table 252 - Entries in a > signature dictionary, this key is optional : > "(Optional) The type of PDF object that this dictionary describes; if > present, shall be Sig for a signature dictionary. " > But PDFBox seems to limit its research of signature only if this key "Sig" is > present. > What is your position about that? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)