Re: Additional signing API for 2.0.3

2016-10-14 Thread Tilman Hausherr
Am 13.10.2016 um 23:25 schrieb dnie...@gmail.com: Hello On 2016-09-09 12:56 (-0300), Tilman Hausherr wrote: If you're using PDFBox for signing, please have a look at PDFBOX-3065. ... Please give any feedback ASAP. Oh it's already closed, so I'm probably late here. But I'd like to present my

Re: Additional signing API for 2.0.3

2016-10-13 Thread dnie...@gmail.com
Hello On 2016-09-09 12:56 (-0300), Tilman Hausherr wrote: > If you're using PDFBox for signing, please have a look at PDFBOX-3065. > ... > Please give any feedback ASAP. Oh it's already closed, so I'm probably late here. But I'd like to present my usecase and see if my reasoning is ok. I wan

Additional signing API for 2.0.3

2016-09-09 Thread Tilman Hausherr
If you're using PDFBox for signing, please have a look at PDFBOX-3065. The change (parallel to existing signing) separates the signing from the file saving. This allows to get signing data from several PDFs, pass these in bulk to a signing service that'll process them with a single signon. I'