On 24 Mar 2015, at 11:44, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote:
Hi John,
Am 24.03.2015 um 19:25 schrieb John Hewson j...@jahewson.com:
On 19 Mar 2015, at 02:49, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote:
I'm about to start to enhance the documentation for PDFBox 2.0.0
On 19 Mar 2015, at 02:49, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote:
I'm about to start to enhance the documentation for PDFBox 2.0.0 with the
initial step to enhance the javadoc files (also covering xmpbox, preflight,
fontbox).
Currently we have a rule - at least in Checkstyle -
I'm about to start to enhance the documentation for PDFBox 2.0.0 with the
initial step to enhance the javadoc files (also covering xmpbox, preflight,
fontbox).
Currently we have a rule - at least in Checkstyle - that a method returning a
non-void type should have a @return tag. That's not
Am 19.03.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de:
John once mentioned that Returns xxx is legit according to an Oracle java
style guide. My own IDE (which is developed by Oracle) brings out a warning.
Hi,
Am 19.03.2015 um 10:49 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
I'm about to start to enhance the documentation for PDFBox 2.0.0 with the
initial step to enhance the javadoc files (also covering xmpbox, preflight,
fontbox).
Currently we have a rule - at least in Checkstyle - that a method returning a
John once mentioned that Returns xxx is legit according to an Oracle
java style guide. My own IDE (which is developed by Oracle) brings out a
warning.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/index-137868.html#@return
Tilman
Am 19.03.2015 um 10:49 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
