Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

It was really meant as a joke. Hope no one was insulted. Funny thing though, Apache's status page showed nothing. Have a great day, C.D. On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 3:54 PM Tilman Hausherr wrote: > On 10.07.2024 09:46, Constantine Dokolas wrote: > > It seems like you managed to take down

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

I've fixed the tagging issue. I mixed up the pom when reverting the release preparation :-( Now I'm facing another issue. Maven runs in a wrong order. It tries to gather all build artifacts at the beginning of the process before they are built. Still investigating ... Sorry for the delay

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

On 10.07.2024 09:46, Constantine Dokolas wrote: It seems like you managed to take down pdfbox.apache.org...  It's back. Also I don't think it was him, there was no website related posting. Tilman

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

I've to correct myself: lucene.apache.org seems to be a bad example: https://lucene.apache.org/core/ works; other projects work as well, e.g. https://tika.apache.org/ Thus it seems pdfbox really has a problem. Best regards, Timo Am 10.07.24 um 09:54 schrieb Constantine Dokolas: Yikes!

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

Yikes! C.D. On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:52 AM Timo Boehme wrote: > No, its the whole X.apache.org which is currently not available (e.g. > lucene.apache.org). > > Best regards, > Timo > > > Am 10.07.24 um 09:46 schrieb Constantine Dokolas: > > It seems like you managed to take down

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

No, its the whole X.apache.org which is currently not available (e.g. lucene.apache.org). Best regards, Timo Am 10.07.24 um 09:46 schrieb Constantine Dokolas: It seems like you managed to take down pdfbox.apache.org...  C.D. -- There is a computer disease that anybody who works with

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

It seems like you managed to take down pdfbox.apache.org...  C.D. -- There is a computer disease that anybody who works with computers knows about. It's a very serious disease and it interferes completely with the work. The trouble with computers is that you 'play' with them! - Richard P.

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

There is some issue with tagging the release when executing the release:prepare goal I'm still searching :-( Andreas Am 09.07.24 um 07:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: It is still tricky but I'm on it. Sorry for the noise Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 20:06 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: There is an

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

It is still tricky but I'm on it. Sorry for the noise Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 20:06 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: There is an issue with the changes from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5789 I've to postpone the release to solve the issue first Sorry for the inconvenience

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

There is an issue with the changes from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5789 I've to postpone the release to solve the issue first Sorry for the inconvenience Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 19:02 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... Am

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... Am 08.07.24 um 08:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Last one: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz This is because the last change I made yesterday. Tilman On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote:

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

Last one: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz This is because the last change I made yesterday. Tilman On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

@Tilman Thanks again for running the tests. Looks good to me, so that I'm planning to cut the release tomorrow evening in about 28 hours from now. Andreas Am 06.07.24 um 19:17 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue.

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut

Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release

+1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas

PDFBox 2.0.32 release

Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For