Release 2.0.15 ?

2019-04-04 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler
Hi, looks like it's time for the next release. How about cutting 2.0.15 next monday? WDYT? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org -

Re: Release 2.0.15 ?

2019-04-04 Thread Maruan Sahyoun
+1 > Am 05.04.2019 um 06:31 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > looks like it's time for the next release. How about cutting 2.0.15 next > monday? > > WDYT? > > Andreas > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@p

Re: Release 2.0.15 ?

2019-04-05 Thread Tim Allison
+1 I should have regression results by tomorrow On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 2:15 AM Maruan Sahyoun wrote: > +1 > > > Am 05.04.2019 um 06:31 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > > > Hi, > > > > looks like it's time for the next release. How about cutting 2.0.15 next > monday? > > > > WDYT? > > > > Andrea

Re: Release 2.0.15 ?

2019-04-05 Thread Tilman Hausherr
+1 Tilman Am 05.04.2019 um 06:31 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, looks like it's time for the next release. How about cutting 2.0.15 next monday? WDYT? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org

Re: Release 2.0.15 ?

2019-04-06 Thread Tim Allison
http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_pdfbox_2.0.15-SNAPSHOT.tgz This compares 2.0.15-SNAPSHOT with 2.0.13 (I think)...IIRC, though, there were no content differences btwn 2.0.13 and 2.0.14. I did not apply angle detection. No new exceptions; 2 fixed exceptions. We're getting higher page count

Re: Release 2.0.15 ?

2019-04-06 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler
Am 06.04.19 um 15:50 schrieb Tim Allison: http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_pdfbox_2.0.15-SNAPSHOT.tgz This compares 2.0.15-SNAPSHOT with 2.0.13 (I think)...IIRC, though, there were no content differences btwn 2.0.13 and 2.0.14. I did not apply angle detection. Thanks again for running th

Re: Release 2.0.15 ?

2019-04-06 Thread Tilman Hausherr
I looked at about 10 files... all are rotated. I suspect this is a result of PDFBOX-4480, that previously some rotated words came as one. But this doesn't matter, the overall extraction of rotated pages would still look bad. For example, the file you mention extracted this in 2.0.14: ... R E

Re: Release 2.0.15 ?

2019-04-06 Thread Tim Allison
>But this doesn't matter, the overall extraction of rotated pages would still look bad. >>...it appears that there were word segmentation problems in both A and B Y. I agree. Thank you for looking more carefully than I did! On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 11:19 AM Tilman Hausherr wrote: > I looked at

Re: Release 2.0.15 ?

2019-04-07 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler
Am 06.04.19 um 17:19 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: I looked at about 10 files... all are rotated. I suspect this is a result of PDFBOX-4480, that previously some rotated words came as one. But this doesn't matter, the overall extraction of rotated pages would still look bad. PDFBOX-4480 is one reason