Re: [VOTE][LAZY] move PDFBox git-wip repos to gitbox

+1 > Am 09.12.2018 um 13:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > Infra stated that we need documented consensus on this. So, let’s have at it. > > Maruan proposed to move the following repos over to gitbox: > > pdfbox-docs - our documentation > pdfbox-jbig2 - jbig2 subproject > pdfbox-tes

Re: Relocating git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

I opened INFRA-17415 (removal of pdfbox-examples) and INFRA-17416 (relocation of pdfbox-docs) BR Maruan > Am 07.12.2018 um 22:56 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > > Am 07.12.18 um 18:39 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > > hi, > > > > > > as announced earlier infra w

Re: Relocating git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

as Lehmkuehler: > > > Am 07.12.18 um 18:39 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > as announced earlier infra wil decomission git-wip-us.apache.org in > > > > favour of the gitbox service. AFAIK we currently have four > &

Re: Relocating git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

.12.2018 um 22:56 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > > > > Am 07.12.18 um 18:39 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > > > as announced earlier infra wil decomission git-wip-us.apache.org in > > > > > favour of the gi

Re: Relocating git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

opened as INFRA-17488 and INFRA-17487 > +1 > > Tilman > > Am 21.12.2018 um 14:48 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > Hi, > > > > given that the move to GitBox has been smooth from what I see I'd propose > > that we ask INFRA to move the remaining repos

Re: Relocating git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

Hi, both are resolved. Please check if you find any issues. BR Maruan > opened as INFRA-17488 and INFRA-17487 > > > +1 > > > > Tilman > > > > Am 21.12.2018 um 14:48 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > > Hi, > > > > > > given that

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report January 2019 due

the last 3 months > - Last committer addition was Joerg O. Henne at Mon Oct 09 2017 > > ## Releases: > > - 2.0.13 was released on Sun Dec 02 2018 > > > > Andreas > > [1] https://reporter.apache.org/?pdfbox > > ---------

Re: AW: Release 2.0.14 ?

+1 BR Maruan > Am 19.02.2019 um 22:11 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > +1 > > anytime. > > Tilman > > > > Gesendet mit der Telekom Mail App >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.14

is package because... > > > Here his my +1 > > Andreas > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > -- Maruan Sahyoun FileAffairs GmbH Josef-Schappe-Straße 21 40882 Ratingen Tel:

Re: Release 2.0.15 ?

+1 > Am 05.04.2019 um 06:31 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > looks like it's time for the next release. How about cutting 2.0.15 next > monday? > > WDYT? > > Andreas > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.15

+1 Maruan > Am 08.04.2019 um 17:15 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.15 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.15/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/rep

Backport Appearance Handler to 2.x

HO as creating the appearance is not a public API in 2.x (or 3.x) there shouldn't be any issue with that. WDYT? Am I missing something? BR Maruan Sahyoun - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additiona

Re: Release 2.0.16 ?

--- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > -- Maruan Sahyoun FileAffairs GmbH Josef-Schappe-Straße 21 40882 Ratingen Tel: +49 (2102) 89497 88 Fax: +49 (2102) 89497 91 sahy...@fil

Re: Release 2.0.16 ?

- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > -- Maruan Sahyoun FileAffairs GmbH Josef-Schappe-Straße 21 40882 Ratingen Tel: +49 (2102) 89497

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.16

+1 Maruan > Am 24.06.2019 um 19:35 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.16 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.16/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/rep

Re: Switch trunk to java 8

; To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > -- Maruan Sahyoun FileAffairs GmbH Josef-Schappe-Straße 21 40882 Ratingen Tel: +49 (2102) 89497 88 Fax: +49 (2102) 89497 91 sahy...@fileaffairs.de www.fileaffairs.de Ges

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.17

this package because... > > Here his my +1 > > Andreas > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > -- Maruan Sahyoun FileAffairs GmbH Josef-Schappe-Straße 21 40882 Ratingen Tel: +4

Re: Apache PDFBox January 2018 report due

+1 Maruan > Am 09.01.2018 um 22:14 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this > month. It's based upon the report template which can be found at [1] > > > Any further comments, objections or additions? > > > > ## D

Re: JBIG2 plugin JDK6 or JDK7

> Am 09.01.2018 um 22:56 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > From what I see, the move from 1.7 was made just because "jdk6 is deprecated": > > https://github.com/levigo/jbig2-imageio/commit/70778022d9a674de6a7114cf1d1b6168b1fc1fe2 > > However pdfbox 2.* supports jdk 1.6. Could we set the jbig2 plugi

PDFBOX-2852

Hi, should/could we start a new issue for that as it's getting quite long and takes a long time to load in the browser? BR Maruan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

[DISCUSS] return values for functions

Hi, many of our methods return null in case an entry can not be found potentially causing NPEs. For 3.0 what about starting to change that so we return the expected object in the PDModel although I understand that this might mean that for some time some methods might return null where others mi

Removing methods deprectaed in 2.0.x in trunk

Hi, there are a number of deprecated constructors, methods and fields in trunk which we deprecated in 2.0.x. What about starting to remove these while we are working on some of the affected classes? BR Maruan - To unsubscrib

Re: Removing methods deprectaed in 2.0.x in trunk

with PDFBOX-4071? BR Maruan > > Tilman > > Am 03.02.2018 um 19:56 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hi, >> >> there are a number of deprecated constructors, methods and fields in trunk >> which we deprecated in 2.0.x. >> >> What about sta

Re: Removing methods deprectaed in 2.0.x in trunk

> Am 03.02.2018 um 20:52 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 03.02.2018 um 20:42 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >>> Am 03.02.2018 um 20:28 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : >>> >>> Yes with some exceptions: >>> - keep the "raw" methods from the contentstre

Re: Removing methods deprectaed in 2.0.x in trunk

> Am 03.02.2018 um 20:54 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun : > > >> Am 03.02.2018 um 20:52 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : >> >> Am 03.02.2018 um 20:42 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >>>> Am 03.02.2018 um 20:28 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : >>>> >>>> Y

Re: Removing methods deprectaed in 2.0.x in trunk

> Am 04.02.2018 um 10:39 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 04.02.2018 um 10:31 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >>>>>> - keep the "height" methods that are mentioned in the builds because >>>>>> these are still being used by ourselves (I thi

PDFBox Website

I'm planning to do some adjustments for the PDFBox Website # top level menu for the major sections # a new blog menu entry with the news and the idea that we write short infos about upcoming changes e.g. 3.0 # a link on each page which takes you directly to GitHub to edit/patch # a more prominent

Re: PDFBox Website

> Am 09.02.2018 um 19:28 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Am 08.02.2018 um 10:52 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> I'm planning to do some adjustments for the PDFBox Website >> # top level menu for the major sections >> # a new blog menu entry with the news and th

Re: [DISCUSS] return values for functions

> Am 09.02.2018 um 19:20 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Am 17.01.2018 um 18:41 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hi, >> many of our methods return null in case an entry can not be found >> potentially causing NPEs. For 3.0 what about starting to change that so we >&

Re: [DISCUSS] return values for functions

t: 09 February 2018 18:50 > To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] return values for functions > > Am 09.02.2018 um 19:20 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Am 17.01.2018 um 18:41 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >>> Hi, >>> >>> many of our method

Re: [DISCUSS] return values for functions

> Am 10.02.2018 um 07:30 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 10.02.2018 um 07:25 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hi, >> >>> Am 09.02.2018 um 23:06 schrieb Mark Tanner : >>> >>> hey all >>> >>> Java has quite strict enforcement of exc

PDFBox tools & CLI

Hi, I'm looking to introduce a dependency on commons-cli for command line parsing of the pdfbox-tools. Will make the code cleaner, easier to read and focus on our core functionality. WDYT? Maruan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev

Re: PDFBox tools & CLI

dev@pdfbox.apache.org > Subject: Re: PDFBox tools & CLI > > Am 22.02.2018 um 08:28 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hi, >> >> I'm looking to introduce a dependency on commons-cli for command line >> parsing of the pdfbox-tools. >> >> Will make the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox JBIG2 ImageIO 3.0.0

+1 Maruan > Am 21.02.2018 um 22:22 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox JBIG2 ImageIO 3.0.0 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/jbig2-imageio-3.0.0/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >

Re: svn commit: r1825083 - /pdfbox/trunk/fontbox/src/main/java/org/apache/fontbox/cff/CFFParser.java

> Am 22.02.2018 um 18:48 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 22.02.2018 um 18:34 schrieb msahy...@apache.org: >> +import javax.lang.model.util.ElementScanner6; > > > ??? thanks - resolved. > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: OutOfMemory error using PDFBox 2.0.4 to merge documents

in error, do not read it. Please notify the sender immediately informing > them of the error and delete all copies and attachments of the message from > your system. Thank you. > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...

Re: How to deactivate the annoying javadoc generation

Hi, you can try passing -DadditionalJOption=-Xdoclint:none Worked for me. BR Maruan > Am 19.03.2018 um 21:16 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > I try to cut the new release but I have to stop at a certain point. > > I've to use a more recent JDK (1.8.0_111) to build as older (1.7.x)

Re: How to deactivate the annoying javadoc generation

I used mvn javadoc:aggregate -DadditionalJOption=-Xdoclint:none > Am 19.03.2018 um 22:14 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > >> On 03/19/2018 09:40 PM, Maruan Sahyoun wrote: >> Hi, >> you can try passing -DadditionalJOption=-Xdoclint:none > Thanks, but that doesn&#x

Re: svn commit: r1827316 - /pdfbox/trunk/fontbox/src/main/java/org/apache/fontbox/ttf/GlyphSubstitutionTable.java

thanks for the review - commited in r1827338 - simply forgot to replace the parameter with the new one :-( > Am 20.03.2018 um 17:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > On 03/20/2018 05:23 PM, Tilman Hausherr wrote: >> Am 20.03.2018 um 15:45 schrieb msahy...@apache.org: >>> -gid = doLo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.9

+1 BR Maruan > Am 20.03.2018 um 17:41 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.9 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.9/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/r

Re: PDFBox 1.8.14 release?

Hi, +1 Maruan > Am 09.04.2018 um 17:55 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > 1.8.13 was released more than a year ago and there a more than 20 resolved > JIRA tickets. How about releasing a new 1.8.x version? > > Andreas > > -

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report April 2018 due

Hi, two smaller changes you might wan‘t to do we are planning to release 1.8 ... to support users who are still on Java 1.6 instead of maybe ... don‘t mention me individually for the website it‘s all a teams effort - we are improving ... +1 regardless BR Maruan > Am 09.04.2018 um 17:52 s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.14

+1 BR Maruan > Am 16.04.2018 um 20:12 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.14 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/1.8.14/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/r

Getting the objects which have been added in an increment

Hi, I'm trying to find a way to get the objects which have been added in a certain increment to a PDF. Am I correct that this is not easily available using PDFBox or do I miss something? BR Maruan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-

Bavaria Test Suite

AFAIK the files are no longer available. Maruan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.10

+1 Maruan > Am 18.06.2018 um 21:41 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.10 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.10/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/repos

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.11

+1 Maruan > Am 25.06.2018 um 20:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.11 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.11/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/repos

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.15

+1 Maruan > Am 25.06.2018 um 20:13 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.15 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/1.8.15/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/repos

Re: closeAndLogException usage in PDDocument

che.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4158 > > Tilman > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > -- Maruan Sahyoun FileAffairs GmbH

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report July 2018 due

+1 Maruan > Am 09.07.2018 um 18:45 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this > month. It's based upon the report template which can be found at [1] > > > Any further comments, objections or additions? > > > > ## D

Re: New releases?

+1 > Am 29.08.2018 um 18:38 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > I'm planing to cut the following releases in about 3-4 weeks from now: > > - JBIG2 3.0.2 (fix for a memory leak) > - PDFBox 2.0.12 (there are about 30 fixes/improvements) > > WDYT? > > Andreas > > > --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox JBIG2 ImageIO 3.0.2

this package because... > > Here his my +1 > > Andreas > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > -- Maruan Sahyoun FileAffairs GmbH Josef-Schappe-Straße 21 4088

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report October 2018 due

Fri Oct 05 2018 > - 2.0.12 was released on Fri Oct 05 2018 > - 3.0.2 JBIG2 was released on Tue Sep 25 2018 > > > > Andreas > > [1] https://reporter.apache.org/?pdfbox > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un

Re: Download issue with some testfiles

If I'm not mistaken they are now available from http://moji.or.jp/wp-content/ipafont/IPAfont/ipag00303.zip https://moji.or.jp/wp-content/ipafont/IPAfont/ipagp00303.zip BR Maruan > Hi, > > I've some issues with the download of the following testfiles. > > https://ipafont.ipa.go.jp/IPAfont/ipa

Re: Download issue with some testfiles

The original link states that the content has been transfered and the IPA-Fonts can now be fount at https://moji.or.jp/ipafont/ So I think it's safe to change. BR Maruan > Am 30.09.20 um 17:42 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > > > If I'm not mistaken they are now ava

Re: Download issue with some testfiles

> Am 30.09.20 um 17:51 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > > > The original link states that the content has been transfered and the > > IPA-Fonts can now be fount at https://moji.or.jp/ipafont/ > > > > So I think it's safe to change. > Done. Thanks for the

Download link via download.cgi

having worked on the download page I saw that the links are generated using download.cgi. Looking at other projects such as Apache Lucene or Apache Camel they are using /dyn/closer ... Is there are preferred solution to this i.e. shall we also use /dyn/close? Couldn't find the docs to which one

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report October 2020 due

--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > -- Maruan Sahyoun FileAffairs GmbH Josef-Schappe-Straße 21 40882 Ratingen Tel: +49 (21

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-4895) Faster COSNumber

ASF subversion and git services commented on PDFBOX-4895: > - > > Commit 1882942 from Maruan Sahyoun in branch 'pdfbox/trunk' > [ https://svn.apache.org/r1882942 ] > > PDFBOX-4895: refactor to use individu

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-4895) Faster COSNumber

Hi Andreas svn -> done JIRA copy over -> done delete from wrong ticket -> no permission Thank you Andreas. Maruan > Am 28.10.20 um 16:07 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > > > Sorry - that commit went to the wrong issue - is there a way to correct > > that?

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-4895) Faster COSNumber

> Am 28.10.20 um 17:40 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > > > Hi Andreas > > > > svn -> done > > JIRA copy over -> done > > delete from wrong ticket -> no permission > Did you try to reopen the ticket? I can only delete comments I made - looked

[DISCUSS] PDFBox 3.0.0

Dear fellow dev colleagues, PDFBox 3.0.0 is in the works for quite some time now. Maybe for too long. Are we in a position to target a release for end of year? Maybe by also dropping all open issues which do not have to go into the release but can be done at a later date because they add functio

Re: [DISCUSS] PDFBox 3.0.0

Hi, > Hi, > > Am 02.11.20 um 08:45 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > Dear fellow dev colleagues, > > > > PDFBox 3.0.0 is in the works for quite some time now. Maybe for too long. > > Are we in a position to target a release for end of > > year? Maybe by als

Re: [DISCUSS] PDFBox 3.0.0

> Am 03.11.20 um 10:03 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > Hi, > >    > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Am 02.11.20 um 08:45 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > > > Dear fellow dev colleagues, > > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.22

+1 Maruan > Am 16.12.2020 um 18:48 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.22 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.22/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.23

+1 BR Maruan > Am 15.03.2021 um 19:52 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > +1 > > 👍 > > Tilman > >> Am 15.03.2021 um 19:44 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Hi, >> >> a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.23 release is available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.23/ >> >> Th

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report April 2021 due

+1 Maruan > Am 14.04.2021 um 08:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this > month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] > > Any comments or additions are appreciated ... > > > >

[discuss] "No glyph for U+... in font ...."

Hi, a very common issue on the mailing list as well as SO is the IllegalArgumentException people get if one tries to use a character with a font which has no support for that. Could we lower the requirement here to instead of throwing a exception use a replacement char and log a warning? Other

Re: [discuss] "No glyph for U+... in font ...."

> Am 03.11.2016 um 17:33 schrieb John Hewson : > > >> On 3 Nov 2016, at 02:11, Maruan Sahyoun wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> a very common issue on the mailing list as well as SO is the >> IllegalArgumentException people get if one tries to use a chara

Re: [discuss] "No glyph for U+... in font ...."

> Am 03.11.2016 um 21:09 schrieb John Hewson : > >> >> On 3 Nov 2016, at 12:16, Maruan Sahyoun wrote: >> >>> >>> Am 03.11.2016 um 17:33 schrieb John Hewson : >>> >>> >>>> On 3 Nov 2016, at 02:11, Maruan Sahyoun wro

Re: [JENKINS] - More build NODES ; Less build LABELS

Hi, > Am 12.11.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > infra consolidated jenkins nodes and labels. The most interesting part is the > comment of the reserved nodes H19&H20. Sounds like we should be able to > create a job to build our website using jenkins. > we are already u

Re: [JENKINS] - More build NODES ; Less build LABELS

Hi, > Am 14.11.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > >> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 12. November 2016 um 16:09 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> >>> Am 12.11.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : >>> >>> Hi, &g

Contribution Information

Hi, inspired by a recent post on the Apache Camel mailing list and https://github.com/apache/spark WDYT about us adding a CONTRIBUTING.md file to our repositiory to inform GitHub users when doing pull requests as can bee seen here. https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-reposi

Re: New releases

+1 > Am 28.11.2016 um 21:38 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Am 24.11.2016 um 14:43 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Hi, >> >> I'm planing to cut new releases for 1.8.x and 2.0.x in about 2-3 weeks from >> now. > > I'm going to cut the releases as follows: > > - 1.8.13 on Monday 5th of Decem

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.13

+1 BR Maruan > Am 05.12.2016 um 21:03 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.13 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/1.8.13/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.4

+1 Maruan > Am 12.12.2016 um 18:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.4 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.4/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/repos/

Re: Apache PDFBox January 2017 board report due

Hi, +1 Maruan > Am 09.01.2017 um 19:45 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this > month. It's based upon the report template which can be found at [1] > > > Any further comments, objections or additions? > > >

Enforce https for PDFBox site

with the general move towards https I've changed where possible the links for our site accordingly. We could enforce https when the site is visited via http - thoughts? BR Maruan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.

Re: Enforce https for PDFBox site

done > Am 19.02.2017 um 00:18 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Am 18.02.2017 um 21:15 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> with the general move towards https I've changed where possible the links >> for our site accordingly. >> >> We could enforce https when t

Re: Enforce https for PDFBox site

Hi, permanent redirect using .htaccess. If there are gotchas please let me know or add to PDFBOX-3330. Thanks > Am 20.02.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Simon Steiner : > > Hi, > > How did you enabled it? > > Thanks > > -Original Message- > Fro

Re: 2.0.5 release

+1 > Am 03.03.2017 um 18:36 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 03.03.2017 um 11:39 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: >> Hi, >> >> I'm planning to cut a 2.0.5 release in about 1 or 2 weeks from now, any >> objections? > > +1 > > Could you please create a 2.0.6 target in JIRA? > > Tilman > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.5

+1 Maruan > Am 13.03.2017 um 19:18 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.5 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.5/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >http://svn.apache.org/repos/a

Re: Problems updating the website

Hi, > Am 17.03.2017 um 07:59 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > I've updated the download section due to the new release. After running the > mvn command to publish the content I saw some unwanted changes. I can't tell > where they came from, e.g. [1] > what in particular is unwanted?

Re: Problems updating the website

Hi, > Am 17.03.2017 um 11:24 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > >> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 17. März 2017 um 11:06 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> >>> Am 17.03.2017 um 07:59 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : >>> >>> Hi,

Re: Problems updating the website

Hi, > Am 17.03.2017 um 12:09 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun : > > Hi, > >> Am 17.03.2017 um 11:24 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : >> >> >>> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 17. März 2017 um 11:06 >>> geschrieben: >>> >>> >>> Hi, &

Re: Branch for new major version?

> Am 21.03.2017 um 19:17 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 21.03.2017 um 17:53 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Hi, >> >> I'm thinking about implementing some stuff which would most likely require a >> new major version. Obviously there are some similar things which already >> came up, e.g. remo

Re: How about switching the trunk to java 7?

I'm fine with it. Are there some main themes we'd like to work on for 3 or is it mainly deprecation, update on JVM and working on the regular tickets? BR Maruan > Am 25.03.2017 um 19:17 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > > Any objections? > > BR > Andreas > > ---

Re: Apache PDFBox April 2017 board report due

+1 BR Maruan > Am 09.04.2017 um 13:30 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this > month. It's based upon the report template which can be found at [1] > > > Any further comments, objections or additions? > > > >

Re: 2.0.6 release ?

+1 can work on some tickets over the weekend > Am 02.05.2017 um 12:42 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > Hi, > > I'm planning to cut a 2.0.6 release in about 1 or 2 weeks from now, any > objections? > > Andreas > > - > To uns

Re: low priority: proxy settings and unit tests?

How about skipping the test on ".. Connection refused .."? BR Maruan > Am 08.05.2017 um 15:36 schrieb Allison, Timothy B. : > > All, > Apologies for this one... Is there an easy way to set proxy information for > the unit tests that get an InputStream via URL without changing any source > c

Re: low priority: proxy settings and unit tests?

son, Timothy B. : > > If there aren't objections, I'll open a ticket and make that change after the > 2.0.6 release. Thank you! > > -Original Message- > From: Maruan Sahyoun [mailto:sahy...@fileaffairs.de] > Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 9:39 AM > To: dev

Re: low priority: proxy settings and unit tests?

could you point me to one - I'll adjust 'mine' accordingly. Maruan > Am 08.05.2017 um 16:02 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 08.05.2017 um 15:36 schrieb Allison, Timothy B.: >> All, >> Apologies for this one... Is there an easy way to set proxy information >> for the unit tests that get an I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.6

+1 Thank you for the preparation work. Maruan > Am 12.05.2017 um 18:13 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.6 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.6/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:

Re: 2.0.7 release?

+1 > Am 09.07.2017 um 22:56 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > I'm planning to cut a 2.0.7 release in about 1 or 2 weeks from now, any > objections? > > Andreas > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.ap

Re: 2.0.7 release?

I've checked the javadoc sources - build is fine for them. I'll update the website after the release. > Am 16.07.2017 um 18:23 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Am 09.07.2017 um 22:56 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Hi, >> I'm planning to cut a 2.0.7 release in about 1 or 2 weeks from now, any

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.7

+1 thanks for taking care of the release. BR Maruan > Am 17.07.2017 um 19:27 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.7 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.7/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sou

PDFBox and PDF 2.0

Hi, with PDF 2.0 being available it might be time to start to introduce some of the features in PDFBox (no rush I think as it will need some time to be adopted). One feature I would like to discuss if it would be good to introduce a version support so one could say to save as PDF 2.0 file or so

Re: PDFBox and PDF 2.0

> Am 11.08.2017 um 18:24 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 11.08.2017 um 10:07 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hi, >> >> with PDF 2.0 being available it might be time to start to introduce some of >> the features in PDFBox (no rush I think as it will need some time

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2442) Non-terminal interactive form fields not handled recursively

Hi Tim, > Am 15.08.2017 um 17:31 schrieb Allison, Timothy B. : > > All, > I can't tell if the triggering file is corrupt or how we want to handle it > on the PDFBox side. The problem is that the parent node is a PDTextField -- > a PDTerminalField -- so we don't/can't look for children, even t

Re: Contributing the JBig2 ImageIO Plugin to PDFBox

dfbox where there isn't one. Could we potentially have jbig2 in a git repo. Might be easier as the current active developers are used to working with git. BR Maruan > > > > Tilman > > Andreas > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >