no problem. i had thought that passing a reference to a scalar to
Apache::print() provided a performance benefit:
http://perl.apache.org/guide/porting.html#Apache_print_and_CORE_print_
and page 446 of the eagle book.
from what i understand now, there is no actually no benefit to this, since
Apa
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > I'm not that comfortable with the perlguts, but it makes somewhat
> > sense to me so I've committed it.
>
> there's already been enough argument that $r->print shouldn't dereference
> anything.
yeah, I agree. Actually, I didn't even remember that
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, T.J. Mather wrote:
I'm not that comfortable with the perlguts, but it makes somewhat
sense to me so I've committed it.
- ask
> Hi,
>
> I have already posted this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> I found and fixed a bug with Apache::print not dereferencing scalar
> referencess th
Hi,
I have already posted this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I found and fixed a bug with Apache::print not dereferencing scalar
referencess that are of type SVt_PVIV. The patch is
PATCH:
--- Apache.xs.old Wed Aug 9 10:23:31 2000
+++ Apache.xs Wed Aug 9 10:23:13 2000
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@
