Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-08-31 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: > Hi Randy, > > > I'll look > > at this also some more, as well as some packages like Embperl, Mason, > > and ASP. But this is certainly a quantum leap (or two) ahead ... > > > > The newest Embperl version 1.3b5 contains some code to work with a threade

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-08-31 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Randy Kobes wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote: > > > excellent news, thank you randy!!! i've committed the patch to cvs, i'm > > thrilled we no longer have to punt ActivePerl users :) > > > > That is great news ... I should expand on the mod_perl tests I

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-08-31 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi Randy, > I'll look > at this also some more, as well as some packages like Embperl, Mason, > and ASP. But this is certainly a quantum leap (or two) ahead ... > The newest Embperl version 1.3b5 contains some code to work with a threaded Perl 5.6.0, maybe this addtions are enought to get Embper

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-08-31 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote: > excellent news, thank you randy!!! i've committed the patch to cvs, i'm > thrilled we no longer have to punt ActivePerl users :) > That is great news ... I should expand on the mod_perl tests I tried. On Win98 I have to set HARNESS_IGNORE_EXITCODE=

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-08-31 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Randy Kobes wrote: [ .. ] > Supposedly the mod_perl > stuff can be installed within ppm as >install ftp://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/pub/other/ppd/mod_perl.ppd I should mention - if ftp doesn't work, this is also available as install http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/pub/oth

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-08-31 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote: > has anybody tried the patch that sarathy posted? > Hi, It seems to work ... (!) On Win98 and using ActiveState's latest build (616) with the latest cvs mod_perl-1.24 source, VC++ 6, and a fresh apache_1.3.12, the compilation went without warnings

where "WhatEverLoginScript" points?

2000-08-31 Thread Pires Claudio
Hi, I installed Apache::AuthCookie succesfully. I tried the example given and it worked fine. Now, I want to use AuthCookie , but I have a problem. I am using an alias directory like this ... Alias /demo/html/ "/home/claudio/demo/" Options Indexes Includes FollowSymLinks AllowOve

Re: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 31 Aug 2000, (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: > > "Matt" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Matt> Ugh... Well I don't mind too much, but I'd prefer if someone else did the > Matt> import and submission of patches - I'll just supply diffs if > Matt> necessary. But if it has to be

Re: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Matt" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Matt> Ugh... Well I don't mind too much, but I'd prefer if someone else did the Matt> import and submission of patches - I'll just supply diffs if Matt> necessary. But if it has to be that way then so be it. As long as you're making a dif

RE: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 9:36 AM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: 'Eric Cholet'; Stas Bekman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Apache::Reload > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > > I'm not fully

RE: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > I'm not fully sure I understand the difference between this and whats > > there already. However yes, you can drop this from Apache::Dispatch by > > simply calling register_module() yourself: > > well, I haven't actually tried it yet :) > > but my

RE: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 9:11 AM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: 'Eric Cholet'; Stas Bekman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Apache::Reload > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > > That's right.

RE: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > That's right... and it's working just great. One thing I'd > > like to add, > > and I'll send a patch to you soonish if you think it's worthwhile, is > > the ability to specify a whole subtree to be reloaded: using > > ReloadModules > > is fine but

RE: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Eric Cholet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 5:59 AM > To: Matt Sergeant; Stas Bekman > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Apache::Reload > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > > > Is there any interest in inc

Re: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > Is there any interest in incorporating Apache::Reload into mod_perl > > > core? It seems to offer much more than StatINC, and in only a tiny bit > > > more code... (I'm not suggesting that this opens any

Re: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Eric Cholet
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > Is there any interest in incorporating Apache::Reload into mod_perl > > > core? It seems to offer much more than StatINC, and in only a tiny bit > > > more code... (I'm not suggesting that this opens any floodgates for other > > > little modules i

Re: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > Is there any interest in incorporating Apache::Reload into mod_perl > > core? It seems to offer much more than StatINC, and in only a tiny bit > > more code... (I'm not suggesting that this opens any floodgates for other > > little modules incorporated

Re: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Stas Bekman
> Is there any interest in incorporating Apache::Reload into mod_perl > core? It seems to offer much more than StatINC, and in only a tiny bit > more code... (I'm not suggesting that this opens any floodgates for other > little modules incorporated into mod_perl, but this one seems globally > appl

Re: Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Is there any interest in incorporating Apache::Reload into mod_perl > core? It seems to offer much more than StatINC, and in only a tiny bit > more code... (I'm not suggesting that this opens any floodgates for other > little modules incorporated into m

Apache::Reload

2000-08-31 Thread Matt Sergeant
Is there any interest in incorporating Apache::Reload into mod_perl core? It seems to offer much more than StatINC, and in only a tiny bit more code... (I'm not suggesting that this opens any floodgates for other little modules incorporated into mod_perl, but this one seems globally applicable, ra