On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Gerald Richter wrote:
>
> >
> > One thing I'd like to add,
> > and I'll send a patch to you soonish if you think it's worthwhile, is
> > the ability to specify a whole subtree to be reloaded: using ReloadModules
> > is fine but after a while adding modules to the list gets te
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Gerald Richter wrote:
> > Gerald
> > - do you just write .def files by hand?
> >
>
> Yes, it is very simple. Here is an example from a project I have made some
> time ago. It exports one symbol:
Thanks very much for the explanations - that helps understanding
this ... In
>
> One thing I'd like to add,
> and I'll send a patch to you soonish if you think it's worthwhile, is
> the ability to specify a whole subtree to be reloaded: using ReloadModules
> is fine but after a while adding modules to the list gets tedious. In most
> cases I want to reload my application
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
> On 2 Sep 2000, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>
> > > On Sat, 2 Sep 2000 11:43:14 +0200 (CEST), Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > Especially when the guide endorses playing with $^T, when one wants to get
> > > a correct -M relative to th
On 2 Sep 2000, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Sep 2000 11:43:14 +0200 (CEST), Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Especially when the guide endorses playing with $^T, when one wants to get
> > a correct -M relative to the request start time and not the process start.
>
> > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000 15:46:46 -0700 (PDT), Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
>
> > perhaps, i've cc'd andreas who originally chose -M, i have the feeling we
> > discussed the reasons ages ago. andreas, do you see any reason not to use
> > (stat _)[9] instead of -M _ ?
>
>
> Gerald
> - do you just write .def files by hand?
>
Yes, it is very simple. Here is an example from a project I have made some
time ago. It exports one symbol:
LIBRARY NWCORE
EXPORTS
_InitNWCoreDLL
As you see, the name of the function must be the mangeled name, in case of
plain C, you
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > I'm busy this weekend (wedding), so maybe you could take a look at the
> > post-install thing. It works directly from MakeMaker's POST_INSTALL (I
> > think thats the right option), and nmake ppd does all the
