On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > > I append a patch that let you say
> > >
> > > PerlSetVar ReloadModuleX
> >
> > I already added something similar, only I didn't see the point in adding
> > in regex support, so I just allow you to
>
> I had thought this use of a static mod_perl lib was similar
> in spirit to what Matt did with AxKit - include all the
> *.obj files at link time, but still build mod_perl normally
> with a dll.
Yes, it is
> As a test, I tried libapreq again, and found
> it was missing 3 symbols from ApacheMo
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Gerald Richter wrote:
> From my point of view it doesn't make any sense to have two versions of the
> library, actualy I guess it will not work correctly, because Apache always
> needs the DLL version and the DLL version and the static lib version will
> _not_ share globales,
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > I append a patch that let you say
> >
> > PerlSetVar ReloadModuleX
>
> I already added something similar, only I didn't see the point in adding
> in regex support, so I just allow you to say:
>
> PerlSetVar ReloadModules "My::Foo My::Bar Foo::Bar:
> One advantage of having the two is that the ApacheModulePerl.lib
> in the usual mod_perl build is about 3 kB (and this is all that's
> needed for mod_perl itself), while the static mod_perl lib is
> about 960 kB.
>
When you build a DLL, like it is done now, ApacheModulePerl.lib is only used
in
> > PerlSetVar ReloadModuleX
>
> I already added something similar, only I didn't see the point in adding
> in regex support, so I just allow you to say:
>
> PerlSetVar ReloadModules "My::Foo My::Bar Foo::Bar::*"
>
Yes, my patch is against 0.04 which already contains ReloadModules, but for
exam
