Re: Line 14 in startup.pl

2000-09-12 Thread Gerald Richter
> this should work in both places (untested). It does :-) I commit it to cvs now Randy, do you make a new ppm from these cvs sources and announce it to the mod_perl mailinglist, so more people can test it? Gerald - To unsub

Re: Line 14 in startup.pl

2000-09-12 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: > This seems to work an Win32 and on Unix. As soon as we solve the failure in > the perlrun test on Unix, I commit the patches to the cvs is that related to the FindBin part of randy's patch? this should work in both places (untested). just "unshift

Re: Line 14 in startup.pl

2000-09-12 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi Doug, > > if ($ENV{PERL5LIB} and $ENV{PASS_PERL5LIB}) { > unshift @INC, map { Apache->untaint($_) } split ":", $ENV{PERL5LIB}; > } > This seems to work an Win32 and on Unix. As soon as we solve the failure in the perlrun test on Unix, I commit the patches to the cvs Gerald ---

Re: [book review] the fate of PERL_MARK_WHERE

2000-09-12 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > What's the fate of PERL_MARK_WHERE build time option? I'm working thru the > mod_perl build options for the book and I wonder whether this one should > be documented or not. > > There will be probably more book review questions coming -- please help us >

Re: Line 14 in startup.pl

2000-09-12 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: > Hi Doug, > > while testing the ActiveState Patches from Randy, I realized that the line > 14 in startup.pl > > unshift @INC, split ":", $ENV{PERL5LIB} if $ENV{PERL5LIB}; > > causes tainting errors when running nmake test on ActiveState Perl (may

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Sander van Zoest wrote: [...] > Well, at least you can get to the data without having to be subscribed > to the list. [EMAIL PROTECTED] or something like that should do that too. :) -- ask bjoern hansen - more than 70M impressions per day,

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > But you are right, we don't have an archive of the dev list, which is > bad... There is a bunch of archives for modperl list, but none for dev :( all the mails are stored on locus if someone wants to do an archive. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen -

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Sander van Zoest
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > I'm not laughing, honestly I'm not laughing, no really ... :) > 64K limit on source files and a static memory limit. Java is a joy... Well, I was attempting to avoid a memory leak in Axkit. :-) j/k I am really looking for a decent solution written in

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Sander van Zoest wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Vivek Khera wrote: > > > > "SvZ" == Sander van Zoest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > SvZ> Hi, > > > SvZ> > > > SvZ> sort of says it all;

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Sander van Zoest
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Sander van Zoest wrote: > I'd link from http://perl.apache.org/#maillists, but the main page at > http://archive.covalent.net/ doesn't have a separate entry point for each > list's archive. So it's not user-friendly. Can you have some

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Sander van Zoest
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Sander van Zoest wrote: > > > > > I'd link from http://perl.apache.org/#maillists, but the main page at > http://archive.covalent.net/ doesn't have a separate entry point for each > list's archive.

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Sander van Zoest
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Vivek Khera wrote: > > > "SvZ" == Sander van Zoest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > SvZ> Hi, > > SvZ> > > SvZ> sort of says it all; I kind of took over Dirk's archives at > > It gives me "In

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Vivek Khera wrote: > > "SvZ" == Sander van Zoest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > SvZ> Hi, > > SvZ> > > SvZ> sort of says it all; I kind of took over Dirk's archives at > > It gives me "Internal server error" when I click on any of the

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Vivek Khera
> "SvZ" == Sander van Zoest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SvZ> Hi, SvZ> SvZ> sort of says it all; I kind of took over Dirk's archives at It gives me "Internal server error" when I click on any of the modperl lists. -

RE: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Geoffrey Young
whoops - I see you guys have already discussed this... I guess I need to read all my mail before responding these days :) sorry... > -Original Message- > From: Geoffrey Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 7:09 AM > To: 'Sander van Zoest' > Cc: '[EMAIL PRO

RE: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Geoffrey Young
I wouldn't mind seeing [EMAIL PROTECTED] being archived somewhere, if you had the inclination :) that is, unless anyone objects... --Geoff > -Original Message- > From: Sander van Zoest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 12:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > But you are right, we don't have an archive of the dev list, which is > bad... There is a bunch of archives for modperl list, but none for dev :( Thats because you need to know the secret handshake, wink - wink, know what I mean, nudge - nudge... :-) -

Re: Mailing List Archive

2000-09-12 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Sander van Zoest wrote: > > Hi, > > > > sort of says it all; I kind of took over Dirk's archives at > and rewrote them completely in xml/xsl. > > Covalent has donated a machine and is willing to su