Re: uselargefiles

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote: > the 5.6.0+ uselargefile flags: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > are still the source of many core dump reports. i just committed a patch > to rip them out by default. mod_perl does not need them. but they can be > turned back on with Ma

uselargefiles

the 5.6.0+ uselargefile flags: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 are still the source of many core dump reports. i just committed a patch to rip them out by default. mod_perl does not need them. but they can be turned back on with Makefile.PL PERL_USELARGEFILES=1 i've tested with 5.6.

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

sounds great randy - do what you gotta do - i'll check it out on the other end testing/proofing sterling Randy Kobes wrote: > On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, John K Sterling wrote: > > > sorry it took so long to respond i had some 'real work' issues :) anyhoo, i am > > really torn on this one. I still th

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

sounds great - i'm sure doug wouldn't think of releaseing without it. Let me know if you need anything else ... obviously i'll test/proof the final patch. sterling On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Randy Kobes wrote: > On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, John K Sterling wrote: > > > sorry it took so long to respond i h

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, John K Sterling wrote: > sorry it took so long to respond i had some 'real work' issues :) anyhoo, i am > really torn on this one. I still think mod_perl should immediately just switch > to the new-style .so - mod_perl has always been the closest darling to apache so > it on

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

sorry it took so long to respond i had some 'real work' issues :) anyhoo, i am really torn on this one. I still think mod_perl should immediately just switch to the new-style .so - mod_perl has always been the closest darling to apache so it only makes sense that it follows the bleeding edge. If

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

i'd support whatever you guys decide on for win32 land. sterls, if you wanna let me know if i should apply your patch from yesterday or wait for another, that'd be choice. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additi

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

- Original Message - From: "John K Sterling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 11:07 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix > > > Randy Kobes wrote: > > > would people get > > too confused

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

Randy Kobes wrote: > would people get > too confused if a mod_perl.so was installed if they were building > against apache_1.3.12, say? Should we have an Apache version > check in there to use mod_perl.so for 1.3.15 and ApacheModulePerl.dll > for pre-1.3.15? Great point - this would also allow

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, John K Sterling wrote: > as stated in my earlier post, apache-1.3.15-dev was just changed so all > modules on win32 look exactly like unix (e.g. mod_status.so). i > proposed we should stay in sync with the httpd group. here is a minimal > patch that seems to work: note > 1)

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

> yeah, its .so > take a look at the thread on new-httpd > > basically on win32 it really don't matter none what the extension is > microsoft .ocx files and .cpl files are apparently just dlls with a different > suffix. > Yes, I know. I just wanted to be sure Gerald --