[getting back to the list]
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > but I think you wanted to make Apache::Test a stand-alone package. Which
> > means that it might be used for perl < 5.6.0, right? Hence the require {}.
>
> by standalone i was more worried about Apache-Test depending on
>
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> we will be incompatible with 'warn' only, since it's taken by Perl
> already.
yeah, same as apache (which are really from syslog) would be great. just
use warning instead warn. of course, we are just building/testing, not
running a service, so emerg,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > looks good, but i would change the first part to:
> > *expand = HAS_DUMPER ? sub { map { ... } } : sub { @_ };
>
> can you please explain why yours is better?
easier to read and expand() could be used outside the module whereas
my $expand cannot.
>
Umm.. 5.7.1 is a devel release... yes? (Sorry, I meant stable... I assumed
that 5.7 would at some point be the stable branch or is perl taking the linux
kernel route?)
--
Jeff Stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, Ju
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > do you plan to implement a $Level similar to Apache's LogLevel, so we
> > have the default set to error or warning for normal builds, but people
> > can turn it up for more verbose output. that would be co
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > Can you give me an example of how would you want to use those? Why would
> > you want to have notify functions have this capability.
>
> can you give me examples of how you would want to use dumper() ?
> t
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Can you give me an example of how would you want to use those? Why would
> you want to have notify functions have this capability.
can you give me examples of how you would want to use dumper() ?
they would be the same reasons.
> Something like this?
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > $ perl -MModPerl::Trace=error,dumper,warning,notice,debug,todo -lwe \
> > 'error "error"; warning "warning"; notice "notice"; debug "debug"; \
> > todo "todo"; dumper [1..3]'
>
> cool. howbout instead of
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Jeffrey A. Stuart wrote:
> Ok.. :) Next question... Will mod_perl work with perl 5.005 or 5.6? (IE is
> perl 5.7 due out soon?)
% head -1 modperl-2.0/Makefile.PL
use 5.006;
5.7.1 has already been released, 5.7.2 is due soonish. it is possible
modperl-2.0 will require 5.8
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> oh, ok - I don't have to call bootstrap myself, but I still need to go
> through the rest of the excercise to load everything up, right?
depends what you mean by 'rest'. if you follow what xs/APR/APR does, ie
link against libhttpd.so in the Makefile
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:39 PM
> To: Geoffrey Young
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Apache::Util stuff
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> > > set $ENV{MOD_PERL} in libhttpd.pm an
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> $ perl -MModPerl::Trace=error,dumper,warning,notice,debug,todo -lwe \
> 'error "error"; warning "warning"; notice "notice"; debug "debug"; \
> todo "todo"; dumper [1..3]'
cool. howbout instead of a dumper function, have the trace
function(s) dump any
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > set $ENV{MOD_PERL} in libhttpd.pm and 'use Apache::Util ()'
> > should work.
>
> this is just for 2.0, though, right? for 1.3 I'm stuck doing the bootstrap
> manually (no apr_initialize equivalent in 1.3)
no, i'm talking 1.3. apr_initialize is
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> >
> > What do you think about adding some semantics for the debug printing
> > during 'make test'. So users can visually tell warnings from errors, and
> > errors from notice statements.
> >
> > so we can us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug MacEachern) wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>> What do you think about adding some semantics for the debug printing
>> during 'make test'. So users can visually tell warnings from errors, and
>> errors from notice statements.
>>
>> so we can use:
>>
>> mpt
Ok.. :) Next question... Will mod_perl work with perl 5.005 or 5.6? (IE is
perl 5.7 due out soon?)
--
Jeff Stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:21 PM
To: Jeffrey A. Stuart
Cc: modperl-2.0 dev-list
S
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:17 PM
> To: Geoffrey Young
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: Apache::Util stuff
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> > I was able to come up with the below
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Jeffrey A. Stuart wrote:
> Ok, is mod_perl 2.0 alpha, beta, stable, what? :)
unreleased, pre-alpha, stable-ish. apache-2.0 is still a moving target,
as is bleedperl (5.7.2-dev), so its easy for a change in either of those
to break the modperl-2.0 cvs.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> I was able to come up with the below module that allows you to use
> Apache::Util outside of Apache.
cool.
> So, my questions are:
> will the ap/apr split make this type of thing unnecessary in 2.0?
we still need something to load the apr librar
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > > similar test works fine for me:
> > > package My;
> > > use base qw(Cwd Socket Fcntl);
> > > sub new { bless {} }
> >
> > This was a perl 5.6.0 bug in base.pm.
>
> Actually, for what its worth this was a b
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > similar test works fine for me:
> > package My;
> > use base qw(Cwd Socket Fcntl);
> > sub new { bless {} }
>
> This was a perl 5.6.0 bug in base.pm.
Actually, for what its worth this was a bug in the caching done for
checking ->isa. The bug exists
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> This was a perl 5.6.0 bug in base.pm.
ah cool, maybe it's fixed in 5.6.1 then? i guess i'll have
to upgrade, altho i'd like to stick to 5.6.0 that's
distributed by suse..
-
To unsub
> it will be worth the wait if you're currently using 1.xx on win32 :)
I've tried out 1.something and definately want mod_perl(!) but 1.x on
win32 is not an option since Apache (on win32) runs threaded using only 1
process (actually 2) and one instance of mod_perl only handle 1 request at
a time.
hi all...
sorry about always talking about the mundane 1.3 stuff, but...
based on this comment by Doug:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl&m=94148186408430&w=2
I was able to come up with the below module that allows you to use
Apache::Util outside of Apache.
So, my questions ar
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, brian moseley wrote:
>
> > in my tests, if i do
>
> similar test works fine for me:
> package My;
> use base qw(Cwd Socket Fcntl);
> sub new { bless {} }
This was a perl 5.6.0 bug in base.pm.
--
/||** Founder and C
25 matches
Mail list logo
