Apache::Request fails on Mac OS X (Darwin)

2001-08-28 Thread Ken Williams
Hi, I installed Apache::Request on Mac OS X, which seemed to go fine (see http://testers.cpan.org/search?request=dist&dist=libapreq#0.33+darwin+1.0+darwin) However, when I ran the mod_perl-1.26 tests afterwards (with apache 1.3.20, built only with EVERYTHING=1), they failed pretty spectacularly

Re: scan's diff

2001-08-28 Thread Stas Bekman
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > it's still not working perfectly, since it has to fish $dump out of the > > file, and I see that it doesn't work for all current files. > > you could change the warning header to include: > # __END_OF_HEAD

Re: scan's diff

2001-08-28 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > it's still not working perfectly, since it has to fish $dump out of the > file, and I see that it doesn't work for all current files. you could change the warning header to include: # __END_OF_HEADER__ or something to make it easier to parse/compare. an

RE: pushing method handlers by reference

2001-08-28 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:37 AM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: pushing method handlers by reference > > > one problem, i think there's a leak here: > + pclass =

Re: require test modules?

2001-08-28 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > How hard would be to add this functionality? i'll try to get it done later tonight. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: scan's diff

2001-08-28 Thread Stas Bekman
> > also are you sure that we need to have this kind of diffs? > > > > # !! > > # ! WARNING: generated by Apache::ParseSource/0.02 > > -# ! Sun Aug 19 10:32:09 2001 > > +# ! Sun Aug 26 01:23:32 2001 > > # ! do NOT edit,

Re: require test modules?

2001-08-28 Thread Stas Bekman
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > > I thought that it's safe to require() modules ./t/response/. But I see > > that it fails. > ... > > RequestIO.so is shared, I suppose the problem is because libmodperl.so > > wasn't yet loaded? > > rig

Re: [patch] adding more checks (fwd)

2001-08-28 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: oh, i understand the problem now. httpd.conf, etc. are generated, but if something dies, t/conf/apache_test_config.pm is never written. next time through, httpd.conf, etc. are not overwritten. i think the solution would be to have a $SIG{__DIE__} handler

Re: require test modules?

2001-08-28 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > I thought that it's safe to require() modules ./t/response/. But I see > that it fails. ... > RequestIO.so is shared, I suppose the problem is because libmodperl.so > wasn't yet loaded? right. 1.xx does bootstrap conditionally based on $ENV{MOD_PERL

RE: pushing method handlers by reference

2001-08-28 Thread Doug MacEachern
one problem, i think there's a leak here: + pclass = newSVpv(HvNAME(stash),0); since pclass was already set to newSVsv(sv) at the beginning. can you test changing to: sv_setpv(pclass, HvNAME(stash)); - To unsubsc

Re: [patch] Makefile.PL prerequisites

2001-08-28 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > of course they can ;) should I cook a new patch for it? > > > > Since mod_perl will be always distributed with Apache-Test, I suppose that > > all the things that can be used in Apache-Test and ModPerl:: s

Re: [patch] adding more checks (fwd)

2001-08-28 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > i didn't try the patch, but i think i just hit the same problem. can you > test if its fixed now? partially, the thaw problem is not there anymore, but the configuration won't proceed because, there will be a left-over t/conf/httpd.conf and even ./

Re: why SBINDIR?

2001-08-28 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > > I don't recall when this thing have changed if at all. I'm messing with > > the build system including APXS which fails and I had to patch it. So > > suddenly I've started to get problems with ./t/TEST

require test modules?

2001-08-28 Thread Stas Bekman
I thought that it's safe to require() modules ./t/response/. But I see that it fails. Can't load '/home/stas/apache.org/test/blib/arch/auto/Apache/RequestIO/RequestIO.so' for module Apache::RequestIO: /home/stas/apache.org/test/blib/arch/auto/Apache/RequestIO/RequestIO.so: undefined symbol: per