On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 02:04:13AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> OK, here is the patch that:
>
> - adds the writefile sub to genfile+throw content in
> - adds a scan for APACHE_TEST_CONFIGURE and its execution
> - implements the PerlRequire test
>
> the ugly parts:
>
> - I wish PerlSwitches we
OK, here is the patch that:
- adds the writefile sub to genfile+throw content in
- adds a scan for APACHE_TEST_CONFIGURE and its execution
- implements the PerlRequire test
the ugly parts:
- I wish PerlSwitches were working with +Parent, so I didn't have to do
the ugly hack with adding yet a
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:57:16AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
>
> > As promised, APR::Table->do()
>
> cool!
>
> > A few things worth noting:
> >
> > * [OT] make source_scan gives me a huge diff and I have to manually weed out
>what's n
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:59:46AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
>
> > I hope this one is obvious ...
> >
> > xs/modperl_xs_sv_convert.h is full if nasty (love them) macros to deal with
> > conversion of blessed SV* back to their pointer form a
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:44:33AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
>
> > -apr_table_vdo
> > + PREFIX=apr_table_
>
> you shouldn't need to add that PREFIX, it is already taken care of.
Yup, realized that recently looking at the parsing code...
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:31:30AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
>
> > Here is my second attempt at $r->print(), notice I removed the MP_USE_AP_RWRITE
> > since it wasn't needed anymore.
> >
> > All test still pass with my patch applied.
> >
>
