Re: ParseSource etc.

2001-10-04 Thread Gerald Richter
> > I have played along this line a few hours, taken the grammer from Inline::C > and Inline::Struct and now have a nearly working replacement for C::Scan. I > think this is the right way to go, since the RecDecent parser grammer is > much easier to extent and modify (and it works on all platforms

RE: why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x?

2001-10-04 Thread Geoffrey Young
>> the shortcut >> >> $r->headers_out(foo => 'bar') >> >> is nice to have, but using set() on the object is more descriptive of >> what >> is really taking place, and may help clarify things for the end-user. > >maybe it's just me, but I think "call it with just the header name >to read, add a val

RE: why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x?

2001-10-04 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote: [...] > the shortcut > > $r->headers_out(foo => 'bar') > > is nice to have, but using set() on the object is more descriptive of what > is really taking place, and may help clarify things for the end-user. maybe it's just me, but I think "call it with ju

Re: why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x?

2001-10-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: > actually, my suggestion (if it didn't come across well) was to scrap > > $r->header_out(foo => 'bar') > > entirely, it's deprecated already, look at the subject of this thread :) > and advocate > > $r->headers_out->set(foo => 'bar') > > over the tied hash arran

RE: why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x?

2001-10-04 Thread Geoffrey Young
> > actually, my suggestion (if it didn't come across well) was to scrap > > $r->header_out(foo => 'bar') > > entirely, well, I didn't really mean that either. by scrap I meant deprecate, not remove. egads, I'll stop now - my peanut sized brain is full of string beans lately instead of g

RE: why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x?

2001-10-04 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:27 AM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: modperl-2.0 dev-list > Subject: Re: why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x? > > > Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > > >>-Original Message- >

Re: why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x?

2001-10-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: > >>-Original Message- >>From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:18 AM >>To: modperl-2.0 dev-list >>Subject: why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x? >> >> >>I know that gozer has implemented the deprecated >>header_(in|o

RE: why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x?

2001-10-04 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:18 AM > To: modperl-2.0 dev-list > Subject: why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x? > > > I know that gozer has implemented the deprecated > header_(in|out), but why > do we dep

Re: generic symbol problems with LogFile

2001-10-04 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:02:29PM -0600, Bryan T. Schmidt wrote: > >>>Hmm... updated to 1.25_01 (2.80 above was mod_ssl... oops). Installed > >>>it, but LogFile still complains... added appropriate > >>>-bI:(sourcedir)/apaci/mod_perl.exp, but that did not help. > >>> > >>>I am totally lost...

why header_(in|out) are deprecated in 2.x?

2001-10-04 Thread Stas Bekman
I know that gozer has implemented the deprecated header_(in|out), but why do we deprecate the two? reducing the number of ways to do the same thing? In any case the documented new syntax for: $r->header_out(foo => 'bar'), now should be: $r->headers_out->{foo} = 'bar'; right? in addition to the

[Patch] Apache->module() (take 2)

2001-10-04 Thread Philippe M . Chiasson
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 08:40:40PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote: > > > Can you tell me exactly why ? I started doing it the way 1.x used to do it > > but it was pretty complicated and I thought about this method instead, that > > sounded as goo