On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>can we make the t/TEST use Apache-Test/lib rather than blib? I've run
> >>'cvs up' but forgot to run 'make' to copy the updates to blib :(
> >>
> >
> > i thought it already did
Stas Bekman wrote:
> There are a few nits to solve with Apache::File compat:
>
> the same here:
in fact this one is the opposite, the syntax in 2.0 is only
$r->set_last_modified, with no args.
> =item $r->set_last_modified()
>
> This method is used to set the outgoing Last-Modified head
There are a few nits to solve with Apache::File compat:
- $r->set_content_length doesn't support the call without args in 2.0
From File/File.pm:
=item $r->set_content_length()
This method sets the outgoing Content-length header based on its
argument, which should be expressed in byte units.
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>But it's still not good for the compat layer. If a user doesn't have
>>this setting it still core dumps with:
>>
>>t/TEST modules/cgi filter/input_msg apache/compat
>>
>
> fixed with the "various bug fixes in the tls code"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dougm 01/12/05 11:11:34
>
> Modified:lib/Apache compat.pm
> Log:
> some whitespace style nits
> remove redundant use of Apache::{Response,RequestRec}
why they are redundant? is it sure that Apache::{Response,RequestRec}
are always loaded?
> -us
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>can we make the t/TEST use Apache-Test/lib rather than blib? I've run
>>'cvs up' but forgot to run 'make' to copy the updates to blib :(
>>
>
> i thought it already did:
> t/TEST on the client does:
> use lib map { "$_/Apa
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>but I guess I don't understand something: why do we need to use
>>APR::File->open? What's wrong with perl's open()? I've it working
>>already. If you don't use perl's open() do you also imply that we have
>>to use $fh->cl
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> can we make the t/TEST use Apache-Test/lib rather than blib? I've run
> 'cvs up' but forgot to run 'make' to copy the updates to blib :(
i thought it already did:
t/TEST on the client does:
use lib map { "$_/Apache-Test/lib" } qw(. ..);
and t/conf/modp
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> But it's still not good for the compat layer. If a user doesn't have
> this setting it still core dumps with:
>
> t/TEST modules/cgi filter/input_msg apache/compat
fixed with the "various bug fixes in the tls code" commit.
-
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> but I guess I don't understand something: why do we need to use
> APR::File->open? What's wrong with perl's open()? I've it working
> already. If you don't use perl's open() do you also imply that we have
> to use $fh->close, $fh->seek and so on, using
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>I'm implementing PerlIO::APR (will be APR::IO in mod_perl)
>>
>>I need to get my hands on the memory pool. Currently I use the global
>>pool via modperl_global_get_pconf(). which allows you to keep your code
>>as a pure per
Stas Bekman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> stas01/12/04 21:31:09
>>
>> Modified:lib/Apache compat.pm
>>t/apache compat.t
>>t/response/TestApache compat.pm
>> Log:
>> - the implementation of compatibility layer for Apache::File from 1.x
>>
> > nice. but that doesn't give you a filename like
> Apache::File->tmpfile
> > does, so we'd still need the old code for Apache::compat.
>
>
> why do you want to know the filename?
>
my ($filename, $fh) = Apache::File->tmpfile;
...
$r->set_content_length(-s $filename);
:)
--Geof
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> stas01/12/04 21:31:09
>
> Modified:lib/Apache compat.pm
>t/apache compat.t
>t/response/TestApache compat.pm
> Log:
> - the implementation of compatibility layer for Apache::File from 1.x
> - tests
Any ideas why tmpf
14 matches
Mail list logo
