Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> C:\home\apache\modperl-2.0>perl makefile.pl MP_USE_DSO=1
> MP_GENERATE_XS=1 MP_AP_PREFIX=c:\server\apache
Just noticed that MP_AP_PREFIX should point to the binary directly on
*NIX, so I tried
perl makefile.pl MP_USE_DSO=1 MP_GENERATE_XS=1
MP_AP_PREFIX=c:
Randy Kobes wrote:
> No, it shouldn't be - the install to \server\apache should also
> copy the needed include and lib files. And there's no spaces in
> the names, so it's not croaking on that ... If it doesn't make
> any difference to you, what happens if you install to C:\Apache2?
> That works f
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Guys, I suggest that you read the design docs before you
> continue. The INC issue has been addressed already.
> Please read:
> http://apache.org/~dougm/modperl_2.0.html
> http://apache.org/~dougm/modperl_design.html
that may not be exactly what he's wish
Jay Lawrence wrote:
> Another point that was mentioned by someone in my local Mongers group
> was that of different INC paths for different sets of users. I confess not
> to
> have given this much thought but upon initial thinking it seems that if
> different users want to have isolated local mod
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
> > Is this a binary install of Apache2, or one that you compiled
> > yourself from the httpd-2.0 cvs sources?
>
> I always build from the sources myself. The sources, however are
> located in c:\home\apache\httpd-2.0, not in
Another point that was mentioned by someone in my local Mongers group
was that of different INC paths for different sets of users. I confess not
to
have given this much thought but upon initial thinking it seems that if
different users want to have isolated local modules (differing versions
of the
Randy Kobes wrote:
> Is this a binary install of Apache2, or one that you compiled
> yourself from the httpd-2.0 cvs sources?
I always build from the sources myself. The sources, however are
located in c:\home\apache\httpd-2.0, not in c:\server\apache\. Is this
a problem?
--
Sebastian B
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
> > Is C:\server\apache the directory to which Apache2 was installed?
>
> Yes, and C:\Server\Apache\bin\Apache.exe is the executable.
Is this a binary install of Apache2, or one that you compiled
yourself from the httpd-2.0 cvs
Randy Kobes wrote:
> Is C:\server\apache the directory to which Apache2 was installed?
Yes, and C:\Server\Apache\bin\Apache.exe is the executable.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishl
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> What am I doing wrong, now?
>
> C:\home\apache\modperl-2.0>perl makefile.pl MP_USE_DSO=1 MP_GENERATE_XS=1
> MP_AP_PREFIX=c:\server\apache
> Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV
>MP_USE_DSO = 1
>MP_GENERATE_XS = 1
>MP_AP_PREFIX = c:\serv
What am I doing wrong, now?
C:\home\apache\modperl-2.0>perl makefile.pl MP_USE_DSO=1 MP_GENERATE_XS=1
MP_AP_PREFIX=c:\server\apache
Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV
MP_USE_DSO = 1
MP_GENERATE_XS = 1
MP_AP_PREFIX = c:\server\apache
readline() on closed filehandle Apache::Build::$fh at
What am I doing wrong, now?
C:\home\apache\modperl-2.0>perl makefile.pl MP_USE_DSO=1 MP_GENERATE_XS=1
MP_AP_PREFIX=c:\server\apache
Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV
MP_USE_DSO = 1
MP_GENERATE_XS = 1
MP_AP_PREFIX = c:\server\apache
readline() on closed filehandle Apache::Build::$fh a
Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> >>I think the first thing to lookat is how PHP builds the jail.
> >>
> >
> > two different issues, no? one is about normal cgi/registry scripts
> > and the other about accessing areas of the server through the API.
> >
> > but yes, registry scripts would need some sort of
>>I think the first thing to lookat is how PHP builds the jail.
>>
>
> two different issues, no? one is about normal cgi/registry scripts
> and the other about accessing areas of the server through the API.
>
> but yes, registry scripts would need some sort of protection as well.
I cannot see
Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> > hi all...
> >
> > I was wondering if any thought was given to designing mod_perl 2.0
> > with ISPs in mind. I know this issue has cropped up on modperl@ but
> > I've been thinking about it lots lately and have an idea (well, some
> > rambling
Geoffrey Young wrote:
> hi all...
>
> I was wondering if any thought was given to designing mod_perl 2.0
> with ISPs in mind. I know this issue has cropped up on modperl@ but
> I've been thinking about it lots lately and have an idea (well, some
> ramblings, anyway)...
agreed that there is
Yeah I also think that 'cause we lack such a support beat mod-Perl so
much !! In the time it is much more powerfull than PHP or so, lacking
support for mass-hosting doesn't give a chance for mod_perl to make it
most widly used..
my 5c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
hi all...
I was wondering if any thought was given to designing mod_perl 2.0
with ISPs in mind. I know this issue has cropped up on modperl@ but
I've been thinking about it lots lately and have an idea (well, some
ramblings, anyway)...
there are lots of problems with allowing users to have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> stas02/01/04 01:29:50
>
> Modified:xs/APR/PerlIO apr_perlio.c
> Log:
> - now APR PerlIO read is buffered by PerlIOBuf layer.
> Attention: this requires at least bleadperl patch 13978,
> 14042 seems to be fine too for me.
Actually it seems that th
19 matches
Mail list logo
