PerlFreshRestart bug - comments please

2002-02-27 Thread Sreeji K Das
Hi I didn't get a response for my first post :-( So I'm making another try (Sorry for cross-posting - but I guess it's relevant to dev list as well) PerlFreshRestart (is anyone using this feature ?) was giving me a lot of problems giving a lot of 'Undefined Subroutine' errors when I restart (USR

Re: trouble with mod_perl the latest perl snapshots / patch 12251

2002-02-27 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote: > > > pretty sure this due to patch #12251 > > that is supposed to be backed out or changed, robin barker was > > working on it. > > Hmn. 12251 was never backed out. Reverse applying it to perl@14870 m

Re: trouble with the latest perl snapshots

2002-02-27 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote: > pretty sure this due to patch #12251 > that is supposed to be backed out or changed, robin barker was > working on it. Hmn. --- Start of forwarded message --- Newsgroups: perl.perl5.porters To: Robin Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PRO

Re: Perl Section Bug?

2002-02-27 Thread Geoffrey Young
Doug MacEachern wrote: > > On 20 Feb 2002, Salvador Ortiz Garcia wrote: > > > I dunno Doug's plans for a new 1.x release yet. > > i know i've been saying this for a while, but i am planning to catch up > soon. if anybody wants to start updating the ToDo file with available > patches, outstandi

Re: Status of mod_perl 2.0

2002-02-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Jeff Stuart wrote: > Question? What is the status of mod_perl 2.0? Also, is it working > with/playing with Apache 2.0 at all? Tell me what's the status of apache 2.0 and I'll tell you the status of mod_perl 2.0 :) But seriously mod_perl 2.0 will be ready about the time apache 2.0 (i.e. http

Re: Perl Section Bug?

2002-02-27 Thread Doug MacEachern
On 20 Feb 2002, Salvador Ortiz Garcia wrote: > I dunno Doug's plans for a new 1.x release yet. i know i've been saying this for a while, but i am planning to catch up soon. if anybody wants to start updating the ToDo file with available patches, outstanding issues, etc., that would really he

Re: trouble with the latest perl snapshots

2002-02-27 Thread Doug MacEachern
pretty sure this due to patch #12251 that is supposed to be backed out or changed, robin barker was working on it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Status of mod_perl 2.0

2002-02-27 Thread Jeff Stuart
Question? What is the status of mod_perl 2.0? Also, is it working with/playing with Apache 2.0 at all? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: trouble with the latest perl snapshots

2002-02-27 Thread Geoffrey Young
> > > > Any clues? > > this has been an issue for months... > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl-dev&m=100167794404350&w=2 > > I have no idea where to start... sorry, I guess I also should have mentioned that, at the time, I was building both mod_perl-cvs and bleedperl nightly,

Re: trouble with the latest perl snapshots

2002-02-27 Thread Geoffrey Young
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > perl 5.7.x snapsnot @ 14868, apache 1.3.23 and mod_perl 1.26. > > $ perl Makefile.PL DO_HTTPD=1 USE_APACI=1 APACHE_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache-perl >EVERYTHING=1 && make && make test > > [] > > letting apache warm up...\c > Use of uninitialized value in string a