On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Randy please test my latest commit. It should just work, now
> that it does the right thing ;)
Hi Stas,
Works fine now - thanks!
--
best regards,
randy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
would those MP_ constants be helpful, such as MP_HANDLER_TYPE_PER_DIR
and MP_HEADER_PARSER_HANDLER? it's hard to tell without working on an
implementation.
You mean using define constants, instead of enums? Or do you suggest to
move defines into this struct?
just placing the define values in
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
I've narrowed down a strange bug I reported a while back.
Seems that using constant for Perl* directives doesn't quite work for
perl 5.6.1 and 5.6.x
PerlModule Apache::Constants
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler Apache::OK
#0 0x0816df79 in ?? ()
#1 0x400a38c7
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Something like that (again just an idea). Perhaps we should really
create a struct:
typedef enum {
VOID,
RUN_FIRST,
RUN_ALL
} modperl_hook_run_mode_e
struct modperl_hook_t {
const char *desc;
modperl_hook_run_mode_e run_mode;
};
and now we can kill all th
Geoffrey Young wrote:
while I tend to want to follow the apache specs closely, I'm not sure
about this. the standard mod_perl meme is to always return a value
from a handler - by letting ignoring the return value of these and
letting the request proceed we're loosing functionality. for
instan
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The solution I see is to store the id in the key, so when FETCH is
called in the SCALAR context it checks whether the key has an id and
uses it to get the appropriate value. Otherwise it calls
apr_table_get(). Does this work?
It just m
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The solution I see is to store the id in the key, so when FETCH is
> called in the SCALAR context it checks whether the key has an id and
> uses it to get the appropriate value. Otherwise it calls
> apr_table_get(). Does this work?
It just might. Try fid
Randy Kobes wrote:
Hi,
The t/hooks/cleanup2.t test in mp2 uses an explicit
value for the size of a file, which isn't the right value
for Win32, due to crlf differences. This diff:
==
Index: cleanup2.t
===
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Check this out. It seems to work now. Here is a complete patch.
You will have to rebuild the whole thing, because of the API change.
[...]
+static MP_INLINE
+const char *mpxs_APR__Table_FETCH(pTHX_ SV *tsv, const char *key)
+{
Geoffrey Young wrote:
we could md5 the perl binary?
eeck!
what about computing an MD5 hash of various attributes of both perl and
mod_perl - combine a few important bits from $Config the important
version and compile options from mod_perl/apache?
Sure, we need to compile a list of options th
Something like that (again just an idea). Perhaps we should really
create a struct:
typedef enum {
VOID,
RUN_FIRST,
RUN_ALL
} modperl_hook_run_mode_e
struct modperl_hook_t {
const char *desc;
modperl_hook_run_mode_e run_mode;
};
and now we can kill all the modperl_handler_desc
while I tend to want to follow the apache specs closely, I'm not sure
about this. the standard mod_perl meme is to always return a value
from a handler - by letting ignoring the return value of these and
letting the request proceed we're loosing functionality. for instance,
filters would no l
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Check this out. It seems to work now. Here is a complete patch.
> You will have to rebuild the whole thing, because of the API change.
[...]
> +static MP_INLINE
> +const char *mpxs_APR__Table_FETCH(pTHX_ SV *tsv, const char *key)
> +{
> +apr_t
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 15:40, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 15:16, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >>>gozer 2003/06/05 00:09:20
> >>>
> >>> Modified:.Makefile.PL
> >>> t/docs/auth .htaccess
> >>
we could md5 the perl binary?
eeck!
what about computing an MD5 hash of various attributes of both perl and
mod_perl - combine a few important bits from $Config the important version
and compile options from mod_perl/apache?
--Geoff
---
Hi,
The t/hooks/cleanup2.t test in mp2 uses an explicit
value for the size of a file, which isn't the right value
for Win32, due to crlf differences. This diff:
==
Index: cleanup2.t
==
Also, one last thing of importance I guess, is anybody seeing test
failures with current CVS of any platform ?
my RH box passes ok with bleadperl against httpd cvs.
--Geoff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 15:16, Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gozer 2003/06/05 00:09:20
Modified:.Makefile.PL
t/docs/auth .htaccess
Log:
s/Apache::(OK|DECLINED)/Apache::Constants::$1/g
argh, now that I looked in eagle: ch0
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 15:16, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > gozer 2003/06/05 00:09:20
> >
> > Modified:.Makefile.PL
> >t/docs/auth .htaccess
> > Log:
> > s/Apache::(OK|DECLINED)/Apache::Constants::$1/g
>
> argh, now that I looked in eagle
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 01:08, Geoffrey Young wrote:
we could md5 the perl binary?
eeck!
what about computing an MD5 hash of various attributes of both perl and
mod_perl - combine a few important bits from $Config the important version
and compile options from mod_per
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 01:08, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > we could md5 the perl binary?
>
> eeck!
>
> what about computing an MD5 hash of various attributes of both perl and
> mod_perl - combine a few important bits from $Config the important version
> and compile options from mod_perl/apache?
I
21 matches
Mail list logo