Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
[...]
Would it be possible to change TestSmoke to create a TestServer object
and call the start() and stop() methods on it, rather than using "t/TEST
-start" and "t/TEST -stop", or is that a really stupid question?
As som
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Steve Hay wrote:
> [...]
> > Would it be possible to change TestSmoke to create a TestServer object
> > and call the start() and stop() methods on it, rather than using "t/TEST
> > -start" and "t/TEST -stop", or is that a really stupid question?
>
> As som
Philippe, is this relevant to your efforts with Module::Signature on mp1?
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH] SIGN => 1 support for MakeMaker
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 18:32:28 +0800
From: Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Mailing list Perl5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
so, I guess we could say
callbacks are now expected to return a meaningful value (OK,
SERVER_ERROR, etc) or return via an official API (exit, die, etc).
relying on implicit returns from the last call evaluated by a subroutine
may result in server errors. see perls
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
is there a non-official way to exit? yes, exit() is exactly that. So
exit() is not good. It has to be ModPerl::Util::exit(). It's only
imported by default for registry script.
I thought it was aliased everywhere and you needed to call
CORE::exit() to
Geoffrey Young wrote:
is there a non-official way to exit? yes, exit() is exactly that. So
exit() is not good. It has to be ModPerl::Util::exit(). It's only
imported by default for registry script.
I thought it was aliased everywhere and you needed to call CORE::exit()
to get the "bad" exit.
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> gozer 2003/10/14 11:23:08
>
> Modified:.MANIFEST
> Log:
> A few files were missing from the MANIFEST
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.76 +7 -0 modperl/MANIFEST
>
> Index: MANIFEST
> ==
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
so, I think we can boil all that down into two brief comments in Changes:
callbacks are now expected to return a meaningful value (OK) or exit
via an official API (exit, die, etc).
+1, but s/OK/e.g. OK/
is there a non-official way to exit? yes, exit() is exactly tha
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geoff 2003/10/14 10:34:06
Modified:.Changes
Log:
add PerlMapToStorageHandler
remove last comment - stringified returns worked in last release so
nothing has changed between releases
[...]
-callbacks returning values whic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geoff 2003/10/14 10:34:06
Modified:.Changes
Log:
add PerlMapToStorageHandler
remove last comment - stringified returns worked in last release so
nothing has changed between releases
[...]
-callbacks returning values which aren't integers or st
Sreeji K Das wrote:
Hi Philippe/Stas,
When I downloaded
http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod_perl-1.0-current.tar.gz
I saw it was still 1.28. Is it on purpose ?
However http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html
shows the version as 1.29
When did you do that? I have just tested and it fetches 1.29. Co
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all...
attached is the implementation of the PerlMapToStorageHandler. there's
not much to it, since the majority of the code is autogenerated.
when I can put into words how the PerlTransHandler and
PerlMapToStorageHandler are supposed to interact with eachother, and
w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gozer 2003/10/14 10:07:58
Modified:..cvsignore
Log:
MakeMaker is now generating a META.yml, so .cvsignore it
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +1 -0 modperl/.cvsignore
Index: .cvsignore
==
Steve Hay wrote:
[...]
Would it be possible to change TestSmoke to create a TestServer object
and call the start() and stop() methods on it, rather than using "t/TEST
-start" and "t/TEST -stop", or is that a really stupid question?
As someone said, there are no stupid questions ;)
Sure, we can d
Hi Philippe/Stas,
When I downloaded
http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod_perl-1.0-current.tar.gz
I saw it was still 1.28. Is it on purpose ?
However http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html
shows the version as 1.29
Sreeji
--- "Philippe M. Chiasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
The URL
>
>
ht
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Steve Hay wrote:
[ .. ]
It's true that we don't need the PID file on Win32. In fact, we don't
even need the PID -- the following chunk of your patch below:
if (my $pid = $obj->GetProcessID) {
Win32::Process::KillProcess($pid, 0);
}
else
16 matches
Mail list logo
