Re: RE : [PATCH] add PERL5LIB to @INC in the correct order

2003-10-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Ayhan Ulusoy wrote: If I may add my grain of salt as an -interested- user for this one... Here's how I would expect PERL5LIB to work : Sorry for cutting you short, Ayhan, but we can't and shouldn't change the way PERL5LIB works under mp. We agreed that it was a mistake under mp1. We simply compl

Re: RE : Namespace for 3rd party general-purpose mp2 modules

2003-10-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Ayhan Ulusoy wrote: > Do we have an "official" namespace for general-purpose third-party > modules meant to be run under "mp2" ? Yes, Apache:: [...] [Ayhan] The reason I thought it wouldn't be good is that : 1) The mod_perl standard distribution comes under "Apache::" and it might be useful to

Re: RE : porting Sandwich to mp2

2003-10-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Ayhan Ulusoy wrote: Sure, go ahead and call your filter modules Apache::FilterFoo or Apache::Filter::Foo. I'm going to release shortly Apache::Filter::HTTPHeadersFixup and probably Apache::Filter::Debug. [Ayhan] Hmmm.. That "Apache::Filter::Debug" sounds yummy... It's available here for a year or

Re: RE : porting Sandwich to mp2

2003-10-19 Thread Geoffrey Young
This module (let's call it Apache::Filter::CheeseBurger) please don't release a module with that name on CPAN - Apache::Sandwich is bad enough - it remains for historical reasons, created far before we (as a community) started taking our namespace seriously :) the proper way to release somethi

RE : porting Sandwich to mp2

2003-10-19 Thread Ayhan Ulusoy
> -Original Message- > From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 10:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ayhan Ulusoy > Subject: Re: porting Sandwich to mp2 > > > Another thing : > > Again, please separate questions in separate threads. As these threads > t

RE : Namespace for 3rd party general-purpose mp2 modules

2003-10-19 Thread Ayhan Ulusoy
Sorry about that Stas & thanks for point it out. > -Original Message- > From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 10:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ayhan Ulusoy > Subject: Re: Namespace for 3rd party general-purpose mp2 modules > > [Ayhan, in the futur

Re: Namespace for 3rd party general-purpose mp2 modules

2003-10-19 Thread Stas Bekman
[Ayhan, in the future, please don't reply to an existing thread, when you start a new one. it causes mail clients and archive file irrelevant posts into the same thread as the relevant ones. I started a new thread with this reply. Thanks.] > Do we have an "official" namespace for general-purpos

Re: porting Sandwich to mp2

2003-10-19 Thread Stas Bekman
> Another thing : Again, please separate questions in separate threads. As these threads tend to grow big, it becomes really hard to manage them. Thanks. > would it not be better to separate plain-old response > handlers from, say, filters. What do you mean? Making it easy to derive from the han

Re: early perl startup in vhost on win32

2003-10-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Steve Hay wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Also, can you please get the trace, after commenting out all the irrelevant config from httpd.conf, leaving only the config needed to reproduce the problem? It'll make the trace much more useful. Thanks Steve. I've reduced the httpd.conf file to just this

Namespace for 3rd party general-purpose mp2 modules

2003-10-19 Thread Ayhan Ulusoy
Do we have an "official" namespace for general-purpose third-party modules meant to be run under "mp2" ? In mp1, "Apache" was widely used for this purpose, but it's no good... The docs speak about "MyApache", but it just doesn't sound right. Another thing : would it not be better to separate