Stas Bekman wrote:
It's a first time I'm trying to build the static mp2. Unless I'm
missing something it doesn't quite work for me. I build it as:
perl Makefile.PL \
MP_INST_APACHE2=1\
MP_USE_STATIC=1 \
MP_AP_BUILD=1
Ah, ignore that, I've got the commit emails with a delay :(
I try to checkin doc + code changes simultaneously ;-) Guess e-mail lag
got you this time :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl-cvs&m=109554589422488&w=2
Nuh, that was bell-sympatico-messing-up-with-ports problem. My stunnel
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
It's a first time I'm trying to build the static mp2. Unless I'm
missing something it doesn't quite work for me. I build it as:
perl Makefile.PL \
MP_INST_APACHE2=1\
MP_USE_STATIC=1
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
It's a first time I'm trying to build the static mp2. Unless I'm
missing something it doesn't quite work for me. I build it as:
perl Makefile.PL \
MP_INST_APACHE2=1\
MP_USE_STATIC=1 \
MP_AP_BUI
Stas Bekman wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gozer 2004/09/18 15:18:53
Modified:src/docs/2.0/user/install install.pod
Log:
MP_AP_BUILD configure option removed. Now implicit when MP_USE_STATIC
is specified
What about the code? It's still there.
Ah, ignore that,
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gozer 2004/09/18 15:18:53
Modified:src/docs/2.0/user/install install.pod
Log:
MP_AP_BUILD configure option removed. Now implicit when MP_USE_STATIC
is specified
What about the code? It's still there.
Ah, ignore that, I've got the commit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gozer 2004/09/18 15:18:53
Modified:src/docs/2.0/user/install install.pod
Log:
MP_AP_BUILD configure option removed. Now implicit when MP_USE_STATIC
is specified
What about the code? It's still there.
Revision ChangesPath
1.65 +1 -9 modpe
Stas Bekman wrote:
It's a first time I'm trying to build the static mp2. Unless I'm
missing something it doesn't quite work for me. I build it as:
perl Makefile.PL \
MP_INST_APACHE2=1\
MP_USE_STATIC=1 \
MP_AP_BUILD=1
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+To enable statically linking mod_perl into Apache, use the
+C> flag like this:
+
+ % perl Makefile.PL MP_USE_STATIC=1 MP_AP_BUILD=1 \
+MP_AP_PREFIX=$HOME/src/httpd-2.x \
+MP_AP_CONFIGURE
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+To enable statically linking mod_perl into Apache, use the
+C> flag like this:
+
+ % perl Makefile.PL MP_USE_STATIC=1 MP_AP_BUILD=1 \
+MP_AP_PREFIX=$HOME/src/httpd-2.x \
+MP_AP_CONFIGURE="--with-mpm=prefor
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+To enable statically linking mod_perl into Apache, use the
+C> flag like this:
+
+ % perl Makefile.PL MP_USE_STATIC=1 MP_AP_BUILD=1 \
+MP_AP_PREFIX=$HOME/src/httpd-2.x \
+MP_AP_CONFIGURE="--with-mpm=prefork"
Why do we need MP_AP_BUI
Geoff wanted PerlLoadModule be available to all modules that require
an interpreter be created early, not merely directive handlers.
So as discussed in several threads the conclusion was:
- remove the magickness of PerlLoadModule wrt directives
- add a special Apache::Module API which will add dire
Pratik wrote:
Finally it breaks with:
LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/lib:/lib" cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib APR.o
modperl_error.o modperl_bucket.o modperl_common_util.o
modperl_common_log.o -L/usr/local/lib -o
../../../blib/arch/Apache2/auto/APR/APR.so
-L/home/stas/apache.org/httpd-2.0/srclib/apr -lapr-0 -lrt -
It's a first time I'm trying to build the static mp2. Unless I'm missing
something it doesn't quite work for me. I build it as:
perl Makefile.PL \
MP_INST_APACHE2=1\
MP_USE_STATIC=1 \
MP_AP_BUILD=1\
MP_GENERA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+To enable statically linking mod_perl into Apache, use the
+C> flag like this:
+
+ % perl Makefile.PL MP_USE_STATIC=1 MP_AP_BUILD=1 \
+MP_AP_PREFIX=$HOME/src/httpd-2.x \
+MP_AP_CONFIGURE="--with-mpm=prefork"
Why do we need MP_AP_BUILD=1 flag? Can't we
SMOKE has found that:
t/TEST -v t/api/access2.t t/api/access.t
(both run in the same interpreters)
breaks t/api/access.t
# testing : satisfies
# expected: 2
# received: 0
not ok 5
That's in:
ok t_cmp $r->satisfies, Apache::SATISFY_NOSPEC, "satisfies";
Any ideas?
I think this was introduced by 2
16 matches
Mail list logo