Joe Schaefer wrote:
> "Philippe M. Chiasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Well, I think we talked about this before, and really, mod_perl 1.x
>>isn't a branch of mod_perl-2.x.
>
> Right, but its a branch of the modperl project. I prefer to think of
> the subversion repository as community pro
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Steve Hay wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> >the mod_perl development team is pleased to announce that we have a new
> >candidate for mod_perl 2.0, ready and waiting for testers.
> >
> No good for me on Win32 :(
>
> Using Apache 2.0.53, bleadperl (@22511), I have the testsuit
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 12:19 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > votes?
+1
--
best regards,
randy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Philippe M. Chiasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I think we talked about this before, and really, mod_perl 1.x
> isn't a branch of mod_perl-2.x.
Right, but its a branch of the modperl project. I prefer to think of
the subversion repository as community property, and the trunk/ being
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 12:19 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> votes?
+1
- Perrin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Hello all. I think it's about time to move mp1 over to the subversion
repository.
I want to spend a few days in the near future going thru the reported
mp1 problems
and possibly release a new mp1 from it's new svn home if
On Apr 12, 2005, at 12:24 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
- httpd uses a branch for 1.3 (and 2.0). when 2.2 is released it
will be a
branch. I think it makes a certain amount of sense to follow this
pattern
(which is also similar for apr). that is, unless there is a good
reason for
us to break wit
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi :)
ok, the reports seem to be mostly positive. we have a few random single
test failures and some OSX build issues. for OSX we have two problem
reports and one success report.
Yes, and I wouldn't hold up the RC because of the OSX problems I've
reported.
It doesn't feel l
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Hello all. I think it's about time to move mp1 over to the subversion
repository.
I want to spend a few days in the near future going thru the reported
mp1 problems
and possibly release a new mp1 from it's new svn home if I can get a
few patches
in
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: stas
Date: Tue Apr 12 09:43:53 2005
New Revision: 161072
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=161072
Log:
exclude all threads tests from the distro, too many failures
hmm... doesn't that m
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
[...]
>> Err, post a release candidate to CPAN, or are we unveiling mp2.0?
>
> no, no. just putting RC5 on CPAN as RC5. I'm not talking about
> unveiling an official 2.0. I hope nobody got that impression :)
Ok. Here's my +1 f
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Author: stas
>>> Date: Tue Apr 12 09:43:53 2005
>>> New Revision: 161072
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=161072
>>> Log:
>>> exclude all threads tests from the distro, too many failures
>>
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi :)
ok, the reports seem to be mostly positive. we have a few random single
test failures and some OSX build issues. for OSX we have two problem
reports and one success report.
I don't think any of these should hold up the release process at this point
- really, this relea
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: stas
Date: Tue Apr 12 09:43:53 2005
New Revision: 161072
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=161072
Log:
exclude all threads tests from the distro, too many failures
hmm... doesn't that make it more difficult for users to run test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: stas
> Date: Tue Apr 12 09:43:53 2005
> New Revision: 161072
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=161072
> Log:
> exclude all threads tests from the distro, too many failures
hmm... doesn't that make it more difficult for users to run tests if
Steve Hay wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
the mod_perl development team is pleased to announce that we have a new
candidate for mod_perl 2.0, ready and waiting for testers.
No good for me on Win32 :(
Using Apache 2.0.53, bleadperl (@22511), I have the testsuite crashing
the Apache.exe server every t
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I don't think any of these should hold up the release process at this point
>>- really, this release is about the rename and nobody has reported anything
>>major on that front. so, I'd like to post an official release to CP
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>the mod_perl development team is pleased to announce that we have a new
>candidate for mod_perl 2.0, ready and waiting for testers.
>
No good for me on Win32 :(
Using Apache 2.0.53, bleadperl (@22511), I have the testsuite crashing
the Apache.exe server every time in perl/
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think any of these should hold up the release process at this point
> - really, this release is about the rename and nobody has reported anything
> major on that front. so, I'd like to post an official release to CPAN
> tomorrow morning.
Err,
On Apr 12, 2005, at 9:19 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
votes?
Dunno if I get a vote, but even though I run a Mac and haven't played
with Apache 2 yet...
+1
Cheers,
David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
>> I'd say use asf/perl/modperl for 2.0 and asf/perl/branches/1.0 for 1.0.
>
>
> Well, I think we talked about this before,
yeah, but I can't recall what we said. for me, I know more about svn now
than I did then, so maybe my opinions are different now :)
> and really, mod_perl 1.x isn't
> a
hi :)
ok, the reports seem to be mostly positive. we have a few random single
test failures and some OSX build issues. for OSX we have two problem
reports and one success report.
I don't think any of these should hold up the release process at this point
- really, this release is about the rena
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Hello all. I think it's about time to move mp1 over to the subversion
repository.
big +1
So, I am looking for feedback on where to actually put it.
I'd say use asf/perl/modperl for 2.0 and asf/perl/branches/1.0 for 1.0.
Well, I think we talked abo
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Hello all. I think it's about time to move mp1 over to the subversion
repository.
I want to spend a few days in the near future going thru the reported
mp1 problems
and possibly release a new mp1 from it's new svn home if I can get a few
patches
in easily.
That's nic
>>I'd say use asf/perl/modperl for 2.0 and asf/perl/branches/1.0 for 1.0.
>
>^^
> modperl/
yeah, sorry :)
--Geoff
-
To unsubs
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>> Hello all. I think it's about time to move mp1 over to the subversion
>> repository.
>
> big +1
>
>> So, I am looking for feedback on where to actually put it.
>
> I'd say use asf/perl/modperl for 2.0 and asf/perl/branche
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Hello all. I think it's about time to move mp1 over to the subversion
> repository.
big +1
> So, I am looking for feedback on where to actually put it.
I'd say use asf/perl/modperl for 2.0 and asf/perl/branches/1.0 for 1.0.
--Geoff
-
27 matches
Mail list logo
