Re: [mod_perl-2.0.0-RC6] make test successful

2005-05-16 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Stas Bekman wrote: Jie Gao wrote: mod_perl-2.0.0-RC6 + perl 5.8.3 + apache 2.0.45 prefork "make test" successfully on Solaris 9 on Sun sparc (Ultra-5_10). Thanks Jie. I don't have much time as I have final at 8am tomorrow, but I'll at least run the test suite on FreeBSD w/ perl 5.8.7, apache 2.0.

Re: Some small fixes...

2005-05-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Nick *** wrote: >Hmm, when you build a static httpd/mod_perl, do you tell apache to use >your preinstalled httpd and not the one in the source. If that's the case, >then your proposal makes a lot of sense, Nick. If not, then it doesn't, >since httpd will be linked agaist libapr it will build

Re: [MP2] 1.999024 fails on OS X

2005-05-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: [...] After a long promised investigation session, I believe I have pinned it down. It seems to have been introduced by change r160562 when the anon_cnt initialization code was moved around as a result. Didn't have enough time tonight to dig down as to _why_ this is brea

Re: Some small fixes...

2005-05-16 Thread Nick ***
> Оригинално писмо >От: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Относно: Re: Some small fixes... >До: Nick *** <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Изпратено на: Понеделник, 2005, Май 16 17:51:28 EEST >-- > >[...] > >Hmm, when you build a static httpd/mod_perl,

Re: 2.0.0 version tweaks

2005-05-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Joe Schaefer wrote: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What my proposal has to do with Apache versions? I was talking about the mp2.x issue. Just to make sure I understand you, are you saying that mp2.2 will also support apache-2.0? We can't say anything for sure at the moment. I'm just tr

Re: 2.0.0 version tweaks

2005-05-16 Thread Joe Schaefer
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What my proposal has to do with Apache versions? I was talking about > the mp2.x issue. Just to make sure I understand you, are you saying that mp2.2 will also support apache-2.0? I'm just trying to understand what is the significance of the minor numbe

Re: Some small fixes...

2005-05-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Nick *** wrote: [...] >> No, now it picks and install the right stuff and there is no problem >> with that. The problem is that I want to use MP_AP_PREFIX and >> MP_AP(R|U)_CONFIG arguments together when building a static MP. Why do >> I think it's good to have it? Well, my dev machine is a slo

Re: [mod_perl-2.0.0-RC6] make test successful

2005-05-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Jie Gao wrote: mod_perl-2.0.0-RC6 + perl 5.8.3 + apache 2.0.45 prefork "make test" successfully on Solaris 9 on Sun sparc (Ultra-5_10). Thanks Jie. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0 (preview!)

2005-05-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Markus Wichitill wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: has anyone confirmed that the CPAN issues are 100% fixed? I've noticed that ModPerl::MethodLookup has again no version number and therefore is back on the update list after a current-SVN or preview installation: cpan> r Package namespace install

Re: 2.0.0 version tweaks

2005-05-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Joe Schaefer wrote: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Actually I don't think this is right: our $API_VERSION = 2; but it's probably too late to change. It should probably be $API_VERSION_MAJOR, since if 2.2 comes out having $API_VERSION = 2 may no longer be a good idea. but we could prob