On Tuesday 14 March 2006 03:01, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> >>I'm fine with fixing things in 2.0 if that's the majority consensus.
>
> I'd certainly put my vote in that direction.
So do I. Don't forget connection pnotes.
Torsten
pgpnqoXjeGg3n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
The t/TestAPI/add_config test fails for me on Win32
because the current way of getting the directory in
on line 58 of add_config.pm produces an invalid directory
name on Windows due the the presence of the drive letter.
This di
Frank Wiles wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:35:45 -0500
> Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I'm fine with fixing things in 2.0 if that's the majority consensus.
I'd certainly put my vote in that direction.
>>I'd have a really hard time doing anything that changes 1.0 behavior
>>at th
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:35:45 -0500
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm fine with fixing things in 2.0 if that's the majority consensus.
> I'd have a really hard time doing anything that changes 1.0 behavior
> at this point, though.
>
> the bugfix that was just committed is a good exam
Frank Wiles wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:55:32 -0800
> "Philippe M. Chiasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Reviving a somewhat old thread here, so for context, here it is,
>>archived: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/modperl/86483
>>
>>Basically, I think documenting this as
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:55:32 -0800
"Philippe M. Chiasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reviving a somewhat old thread here, so for context, here it is,
> archived: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/modperl/86483
>
> Basically, I think documenting this as a feature was not such a good
Randy Kobes wrote:
> The t/TestAPI/add_config test fails for me on Win32
> because the current way of getting the directory in
> on line 58 of add_config.pm produces an invalid directory
> name on Windows due the the presence of the drive letter.
> This diff:
>
> ==
Geoffrey Young wrote:
> FYI
Resolved in change 385693.
Philippe M. Chiasson m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ GPG KeyID : 88C3A5A5
http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3A5A5
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> Geoff,
>
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 19:21, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>>>Nevertheless, I really think it is a bug, since it provokes action at a
>>>distance.
>>
>>I think it's best filed under "feature" - the mp1 behavior is not going
>>to change and has been more than ok
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>Passes all tests, but I see tons (66 to be precise) of this warning in the
>>error_log, geoff ?
>>
>>"Use of uninitialized value in caller at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/Test.pm line
>>374."
>
> yeah, I suspect that's because I'm playing around with how things are
> planned, etc.
> Passes all tests, but I see tons (66 to be precise) of this warning in the
> error_log, geoff ?
>
> "Use of uninitialized value in caller at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/Test.pm line
> 374."
yeah, I suspect that's because I'm playing around with how things are
planned, etc.
it will probably be easie
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>>I'll work something up when I have the chance... in a month or two :)
>
> God do I know the feeling.
>
> Thanks for the good eyes Gozer.
No problem, and attached is a modified patch that:
1 - Doesn't leak a HV * on each pass
2 - Merges the pnotes logic between r->pno
FYI
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #18140] Syntax error with mod_perl and mod_rewrite,
Apache::Registry
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:06:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Guest via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
13 matches
Mail list logo
