I think you want the (void) for the 2nd case?
Thank you.
I'm going to go hide in a corner for a few hours.
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior S
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pgollucci
Date: Fri Jun 2 11:05:31 2006
New Revision: 411224
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411224&view=rev
Log:
PERL_SYS_INIT3() on WIN32 is a do {}
Report by: Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modified:
perl/modperl/trunk/src/modules/
If there's no objections, I'll commit the change
that I proposed in an earlier message - to use
t/conf/httpd.conf as the file for the (apr|apr-ext)/finfo
tests - to fix an occasional failure on Win32.
Wrong person to ask, but I've definetely no objections.
+1
--
I just tried again with rev 411082 and I initially got a compile error
that I haven't seen before, caused by a (void) that has been added to
PERL_SYS_INIT3() which doesn't work on Win32 because PERL_SYS_INIT3()
here is a do { ... } while (0) statement.
After removing that (see attached patch)
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Geoffrey Young wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi, I just counted 20 changes in the CHANGES file since 2.0.2.
I'm seeing all tests pass again on all 3 mpms and all httpd versions
2.055+ on FreeBSD.
I'm not sure about windows (randy,steve?)
I'll volunteer to RM it.
seem
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Hi, I just counted 20 changes in the CHANGES file since 2.0.2.
>
> I'm seeing all tests pass again on all 3 mpms and all httpd versions
> 2.055+ on FreeBSD.
>
> I'm not sure about windows (randy,steve?)
>
> I'll volunteer to RM it.
seems reasonable, once the win32 is
> Thats a freaking lot of combinations for mod_perl2 to support. I'm
> impressed.
> Anyone thought of dropping support for old versions of httpd ? I know I
> don't ever compile less
> then 2.0.50 for testing these days which was released 29-Jun-2004 01:20
> and thus 2 years old minus 1 month.
we
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi, I just counted 20 changes in the CHANGES file since 2.0.2.
I'm seeing all tests pass again on all 3 mpms and all httpd versions
2.055+ on FreeBSD.
I'm not sure about windows (randy,steve?)
All OK here on WinXP with 2
Steve Hay wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi, I just counted 20 changes in the CHANGES file since 2.0.2.
I'm seeing all tests pass again on all 3 mpms and all httpd versions
2.055+ on FreeBSD.
I'm not sure about windows (randy,steve?)
All OK here on WinXP with 2.2.2, except for the known
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi, I just counted 20 changes in the CHANGES file since 2.0.2.
I'm seeing all tests pass again on all 3 mpms and all httpd versions
2.055+ on FreeBSD.
I'm not sure about windows (randy,steve?)
All OK here on WinXP with 2.2.2, except for the known api/status
failur
10 matches
Mail list logo
