Frank Wiles wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:47:05 -0700
Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The mod_perl survey has hit 295 responses as of today. A fairly
respectable showing considering we didn't put a whole lot of effort
into getting it out there.
Was thinking about sending an email to th
Frank Wiles wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:47:05 -0700
Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The mod_perl survey has hit 295 responses as of today. A fairly
respectable showing considering we didn't put a whole lot of effort
into getting it out there.
Have you linked to it from perl.apache.or
snowcrash+modperl wrote:
i just updated modperl/trunk r677481 --> r681027
Can you please provide the last 10-20 or so lines of the make output...
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/help/help.html#Reporting_Problems
--
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:47:05 -0700
Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The mod_perl survey has hit 295 responses as of today. A fairly
> respectable showing considering we didn't put a whole lot of effort
> into getting it out there.
>
> Was thinking about sending an email to the main list
On Fri 18 Jul 2008, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> > Please review.
>
> + /* use the same error message as perl core's read() */
> + Perl_croak(aTHX_ "Negative length");
> It possible someone is regexing $@ against the previous string. Do
> you really need to ch
i just updated modperl/trunk r677481 --> r681027
make still fails as above.
anyone?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
