Re: [patch] http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=21554

2009-04-19 Thread Fred Moyer
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Adam Prime wrote: > Fred Moyer wrote: >> >> This seems like a reasonable request.  I know there are a few times >> that I had to put the apreq module load in extra.conf.in, and it would >> have been nice to have things magically 'just work'.  I only have one >> mod

Re: [patch] http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=21554

2009-04-19 Thread Adam Prime
Fred Moyer wrote: This seems like a reasonable request. I know there are a few times that I had to put the apreq module load in extra.conf.in, and it would have been nice to have things magically 'just work'. I only have one modperl application that does not use libapreq, and I think that I wou

[patch] http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=21554

2009-04-19 Thread Fred Moyer
This seems like a reasonable request. I know there are a few times that I had to put the apreq module load in extra.conf.in, and it would have been nice to have things magically 'just work'. I only have one modperl application that does not use libapreq, and I think that I wouldn't mind the extra