Re: [patch] http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=21554

2009-04-21 Thread Fred Moyer
Any other thoughts on this from the dev list (Adam commented on this thread already)? Here's a copy of the diff again. This was marked as a critical bug for Apache::Test, but I moved it to wishlist (since it is an enhancement). There are currently 4 open RT tickets for Apache::Test, this is one

Re: [vote] version.pm to Apache::Test

2009-04-21 Thread Fred Moyer
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Adam Prime wrote: > Fred Moyer wrote: >> >> Are committers in favor of adding version.pm to Apache::Test? >> >> http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=13126 >> >> I'm willing to live with it if it means that less users with problems >> running 'perl Makefile

[Fwd: [yapc] Official Call for Proposals for YAPC|10 ends Friday, 24 April 2009]

2009-04-21 Thread Adam Prime
FYI. Original Message Subject: [yapc] Official Call for Proposals for YAPC|10 ends Friday, 24 April 2009 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:26:34 -0400 From: Robert Blackwell To: [email protected] The official Call for Proposals for YAPC|10 ends Friday, 24 April 2009. http://yapc10.or

Re: [patch] Apache::Test #41239: t/TEST -ping does not return a valid return code to the calling shell

2009-04-21 Thread Adam Prime
Fred Moyer wrote: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=41239 This patch as demonstrated in the RT ticket resolves the issue. Thoughts? Demonstrating documented behavior here on my test setup (returning 1 return code to the shell). This seems reasonable to me. Adam Index: lib/Apac

Re: [vote] version.pm to Apache::Test

2009-04-21 Thread Adam Prime
Fred Moyer wrote: Are committers in favor of adding version.pm to Apache::Test? http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=13126 I'm willing to live with it if it means that less users with problems running 'perl Makefile.PL' Is that actually the right RT link, or should it be this one: h