Thanks for the spot. We're rolling rc3 for 2.0.6 right now, I have
cc'd the dev list about this issue. I may have some tuits to look at
this, but am guessing someone else will fix it more quickly.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Brian Millett wrote:
> Well, its a no go, even after checking out
Steve Hay wrote on 2012-02-21:
> Fred Moyer wrote on 2012-02-21:
>> 2012/2/20 Torsten Förtsch :
> 2) commit Steve's changes to A::R and A::SL and roll another RC
> with them ...
I think that's the best solution too, not least since the state of
A::R in
RC2 seems a little wonk
Fred Moyer wrote on 2012-02-21:
> 2012/2/20 Torsten Förtsch :
2) commit Steve's changes to A::R and A::SL and roll another RC
with them ...
>>> I think that's the best solution too, not least since the state of
>>> A::R in
>>> RC2 seems a little wonky anyway, claiming to be 0.11, but not
