Re: -Wdeclaration-after-statement Final version

2005-08-23 Thread Andy_Bach
> > Isn't "return;" the more canonical way of returning false ? > Beats me... I know a lot of the mp2 code particular Apache2::Status as I was just digging in there uses return 0. I really have no preference. Just a note, the new "Perl Best Practices" Damian Conway, suggest a bare return is be

Re: missmatch in Apache::Build httpd_version and 2.0.44 ap_release.h #definestring

2003-03-11 Thread Andy_Bach
I am naive and new to this world of mod_bleeding_whatney's_red_label_perl and such, but ...  seeings how this is a long running pain, wouldn't it make some sense to have apxs return a version number on its own?  Is the deal that, often, apache isn't compiled yet, so that's why its rummaging around

Re: missmatch in Apache::Build httpd_version and 2.0.44 ap_release.h #definestring

2003-03-11 Thread Andy_Bach
RIght, it is version 1.99_05, which I'm fairly sure I got from perl.apache.org just the other night. I'll fetch the latest and try again - I gather from the tone of the msg and the quoted code comment, this is a bit of a sore point.  I apologize for bringing it up again.aAndy Bach, Sys. ManglerInte

missmatch in Apache::Build httpd_version and 2.0.44 ap_release.h #definestring

2003-03-11 Thread Andy_Bach
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<-- 1. Problem Description: perl Makefile.PL fails no matter which options I give it. The problem appears to be in Apache::Build.pm, in sub httpd_version, as its looking for: while(<$fh>) { print "ver; $_"; nex