I just committed this patch r957309. I opted for this version rather
than the perl generated targets in this thread only because this one
fits in snugly with the existing style.
I poked this several different ways to make sure it is doing
everything from running the tests to installing the module
On 10-06-15 15:14 , Adam Prime wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>> How about this cute trick using make -k ? Quick testing seems to
>> indicate it ends up doing the right thing for me.
>>
>
> seems reasonable to me, is there any make magic that can be done to
> automatically create all the run
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
How about this cute trick using make -k ? Quick testing seems to
indicate it ends up doing the right thing for me.
seems reasonable to me, is there any make magic that can be done to
automatically create all the run_subtests targets?
Adam
---
On 10-06-14 22:47 , Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 06/14/10 19:46, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>> On 10-06-14 15:16 , Fred Moyer wrote:
>>> I put this patch together as part of the todo list for 2.0.5. Gozer,
>>> is this what we are looking for?
>>>
>>> Index: Makefile.PL
>>> =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/10 19:46, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> On 10-06-14 15:16 , Fred Moyer wrote:
>> I put this patch together as part of the todo list for 2.0.5. Gozer,
>> is this what we are looking for?
>>
>> Index: Makefile.PL
>>
On 10-06-14 15:16 , Fred Moyer wrote:
> I put this patch together as part of the todo list for 2.0.5. Gozer,
> is this what we are looking for?
>
> Index: Makefile.PL
> ===
> --- Makefile.PL (revision 953555)
> +++ Makefile.PL (worki
I put this patch together as part of the todo list for 2.0.5. Gozer,
is this what we are looking for?
Index: Makefile.PL
===
--- Makefile.PL (revision 953555)
+++ Makefile.PL (working copy)
@@ -786,6 +786,8 @@
$(FULLPERL) -I$
