On Sunday 04 April 2010 18:43:29 Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> This is another idea to solve the problem. We used to save and restore the
> file handle. Why not simply localize it?
>
[...]
> Opinions?
>
> How do I build a modperl that uses tied IO?
>
This version compiles cleanly and passes all test
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 16:43:04 Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> This one is much simpler.
>
This is another idea to solve the problem. We used to save and restore the
file handle. Why not simply localize it?
The caller of the override/restore functions already creates the opening and
closing brace
On Friday 02 April 2010 22:56:48 Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> I would very much
> appreciate seeing a test case for this known issue/bug.
>
Here are 2 test cases. The 2nd one is a bit stricter in that it requires a
file handle attribute ($.) to survive, not the file descriptor:
Index: t/respons
On 10-03-31 10:59 , Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 16:43:04 Torsten Förtsch wrote:
>> I believe the IoFLUSH_off in the override function can be omitted since
>> this is standard for a new handle.
>>
> This appears to be true. This is now the final version of the patch. Are
> t
God speed messing with PerlIO stuff.
On 04/01/10 14:34, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 17:55:47 Fred Moyer wrote:
Can you repost the latest patch inline so that interested parties can
add comments and understand what is going on in there? I know that
only a few people under
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 17:55:47 Fred Moyer wrote:
> Can you repost the latest patch inline so that interested parties can
> add comments and understand what is going on in there? I know that
> only a few people understand the innards of mod_perl with XS magic,
> but just getting it out there w
2010/3/31 Torsten Förtsch :
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 16:43:04 Torsten Förtsch wrote:
>> I believe the IoFLUSH_off in the override function can be omitted since
>> this is standard for a new handle.
>>
> This appears to be true. This is now the final version of the patch. Are there
> any objecti
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 16:43:04 Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> I believe the IoFLUSH_off in the override function can be omitted since
> this is standard for a new handle.
>
This appears to be true. This is now the final version of the patch. Are there
any objections against applying it to trunk?
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 19:10:36 Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> Previously the code did something similar to
>
> open SAVEFH, '<&STDIN';
> close STDIN;
> ...
> open STDIN, '<&SAVEFH';
>
> The idea is to change that into
>
> open SAVEFH, '<&='.fileno(STDIN);
> close STDIN;
> ...
> open
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 20:08:00 Fred Moyer wrote:
> Torsten can you post a breakdown of each part in the patch so those of
> us who can't grok all of it (I'm one of them!) can get a handle (no
> pun intended) on what each part does?
>
Best I think if you look at the patch result. Previously ther
Torsten can you post a breakdown of each part in the patch so those of
us who can't grok all of it (I'm one of them!) can get a handle (no
pun intended) on what each part does?
2010/3/30 Fred Moyer :
> 2010/3/30 Torsten Förtsch :
>> Hi,
>>
>> the patch below is a raw fix for the "mod_perl closes a
2010/3/30 Torsten Förtsch :
> Hi,
>
> the patch below is a raw fix for the "mod_perl closes apache's stdin and/or
> stdout"-bug, see also
>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/modperl/94921
Posting a copy of the patch inline for the archives. Thanks for
putting this together Torsten.
Hi,
the patch below is a raw fix for the "mod_perl closes apache's stdin and/or
stdout"-bug, see also
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/modperl/94921
Previously the code did something similar to
open SAVEFH, '<&STDIN';
close STDIN;
...
open STDIN, '<&SAVEFH';
The idea is
13 matches
Mail list logo
