Re: moving modperl-site rep into modperl-docs rep

2001-11-03 Thread Gerald Richter
> > > > Most things will be static and pregenerated, like you plan it for the > > mod_perl site. There maybe a small dynamic part, where people are able to > > add links, examples, news etc. > > > that would be a very good thing to have! The problem is providing the required setup on apache.org. >

Re: moving modperl-site rep into modperl-docs rep

2001-11-03 Thread Stas Bekman
>>Say, do you plan on static output from Embperl or only dynamic for >>embperl docs? It doesn't make much sense to serve static content >>dynamically, resource wise of course. >> >> > > Most things will be static and pregenerated, like you plan it for the > mod_perl site. There maybe a small dyn

Re: moving modperl-site rep into modperl-docs rep

2001-11-03 Thread Gerald Richter
> > Well, the code is quite crude yet, and it's hard to modularize before > you know what to plan for, but yes the rendering engine is a separate > thing. So after generalizing it and making it pluggable it should be > possible to use other rendering modules. > I will take a look at it when you r

Re: moving modperl-site rep into modperl-docs rep

2001-11-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Gerald Richter wrote: >> - the package handles links so we have no problem linking to e.g. >>perl.apache.org/dist/ >> > > ok, so we have the possibility to use content that is not part of the docset yup. >> - embperl site, I suppose it can be folded into the docset, if Gerald >>doesn't mi

Re: moving modperl-site rep into modperl-docs rep

2001-11-02 Thread Gerald Richter
> > With my proposal we will have to do: >on our machines: >1. cvs up >2. apply changes >3. cvs ci >on apache.org: >4. cvs up >5. bin/build > > so there is one extra step to do. Is this OK? > For the modperl site that would be ok for me. (Since everything is done for m