Nathan Torkington wrote:
>>cvs where? it has to stay at perl.apache.org I believe.
>>
>
> Didn't you say that the current site is maintained with CVS? Just
> make a subdirectory /new and put the new site into that. Work from
> there.
ok
>>Also what components framework have you used, is i
Stas Bekman writes:
> Though I prefer mild colours, not shouting ones. I use the site all the
> time, and I don't need to be shouted at. May be we want a splash page
> just for some entrance page, which those who use the site daily don't
> have to see. I like the colours at use.perl.org and eve
Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Ken Williams writes:
>
>>Not that I dislike them - the current colors let me look at the page
>>for a few seconds, then shut off the monitor and read the text while
>>staring at a blank white sheet of paper.
>>
man, that was so strong, I thought I've hit some wrong l
Ken Williams writes:
> Not that I dislike them - the current colors let me look at the page
> for a few seconds, then shut off the monitor and read the text while
> staring at a blank white sheet of paper.
I'm impressed that you suffered such intense retinal distress and
never made the logical de
Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are some web design To Do items:
> * ensure colors are part of the standard palette (right now they're
>just easy to type in hex :-)
Holy shit Nat, those colors are strong. =) You've really taken
attention-getting into the twenty-first
Before I forget to say anything:
Ask, haven't you set up a basic Mason framework for the *.perl.org sites
that an apache.perl.org could just piggyback onto? Stas, I think that was
why Nat suggested Mason - not that using Mason would necessarily make
anything better itself, but that we could g
Ken Williams wrote:
> Before I forget to say anything:
>
> Ask, haven't you set up a basic Mason framework for the *.perl.org sites
> that an apache.perl.org could just piggyback onto? Stas, I think that
> was why Nat suggested Mason - not that using Mason would necessarily
> make anything b
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> can you please post the URL again? thanks!
http://thisishomemade.com/for/modperl/site/
like he said before, it's really just a reorganization of
the available information, rather than a complete site
architecture with fancy rollover navigation, huge menu
brian moseley wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>We have had two new designs worked out long time ago,
>>but one has been picked by take23.org and the other
>>wasn't applied. (hi brian)
>>
>
> :(
>
> sorry! i have this tendency to bite off more than i can
> chew. i have 10
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> We have had two new designs worked out long time ago,
> but one has been picked by take23.org and the other
> wasn't applied. (hi brian)
:(
sorry! i have this tendency to bite off more than i can
chew. i have 10 projects and none of them will ever be
fin
10 matches
Mail list logo
