On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 03:13:03PM -0700, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>
>
> Stas Bekman wrote:
> >Paul Johnson wrote:
> >[...]
> >
> >>And here is another view on the data, this time with the Perl code
> >>included.
> >>
> >> http://pjcj.sytes.net/cover/mod_perl-1.99_13/cover_db-5.9.2/coverage.ht
Stas Bekman wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
[...]
And here is another view on the data, this time with the Perl code
included.
http://pjcj.sytes.net/cover/mod_perl-1.99_13/cover_db-5.9.2/coverage.html
(That's on my local machine, so it may be a little unreliable.)
This was using apache-2.0.49, mod_per
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 10:46:07AM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> >On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 15:42, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>rbb is back to the game and he brings gcov (test coverage) for the apr
> >>test suite:
> >>http://apr.apache.org/coverage/index.html
> >>I wonder i
Paul Johnson wrote:
[...]
And here is another view on the data, this time with the Perl code
included.
http://pjcj.sytes.net/cover/mod_perl-1.99_13/cover_db-5.9.2/coverage.html
(That's on my local machine, so it may be a little unreliable.)
This was using apache-2.0.49, mod_perl-1.99_13, and bl
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 15:42, Stas Bekman wrote:
rbb is back to the game and he brings gcov (test coverage) for the apr test suite:
http://apr.apache.org/coverage/index.html
I wonder if we could/should to do the same for mp2.
http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/mod_perl/coverag
rbb is back to the game and he brings gcov (test coverage) for the apr test suite:
http://apr.apache.org/coverage/index.html
I wonder if we could/should to do the same for mp2.
Another things that I'd like to get working is valgrind. It doesn't quite work
with Apache, as it reports too many proble
