Re: maintainer mode (was Re: httpd 2.3.01 and t/modules/proxy.t)

2005-09-29 Thread Geoffrey Young
Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:08:58AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > >>Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> >>>2.0.47 bus core dumps when you attempt to run it despite compiling under >>>maintainer mode. >>>I believe this is your same core dump mentioned above. >> >>yeah, sounds like it.

Re: maintainer mode (was Re: httpd 2.3.01 and t/modules/proxy.t)

2005-09-29 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:08:58AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > 2.0.47 bus core dumps when you attempt to run it despite compiling under > > maintainer mode. > > I believe this is your same core dump mentioned above. > > yeah, sounds like it. mod_perl won't even bu

Re: maintainer mode (was Re: httpd 2.3.01 and t/modules/proxy.t)

2005-09-28 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Geoffrey Young wrote: While I'm thinking about it, from SOURCE, not ports on FreeBSD, I don't worry about official releases compiling without errors or under maintainer mode - they're already out there, so there's nothing we can d

maintainer mode (was Re: httpd 2.3.01 and t/modules/proxy.t)

2005-09-28 Thread Geoffrey Young
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Geoffrey Young wrote: > >> to that end, this patch seems to do the trick. tested against 2.0.54 and >> httpd trunk. someone else will need to test 2.0.47 since I'm getting odd >> compile warnings and coredumps in httpd at the moment on fc3 >> (unrelated to >> mod_pe