Re: make DESTDIR=... install

2005-04-21 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > It may be easier to blame the tool but SVN just does what you tell it, > > there is no automatic branch merging. SVN is little more advanced than > > CVS in this regard; it relies on some external mechanism (e.g. human > > bean

Re: make DESTDIR=... install

2005-04-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
> It may be easier to blame the tool but SVN just does what you tell it, > there is no automatic branch merging. SVN is little more advanced than > CVS in this regard; it relies on some external mechanism (e.g. human > beans) to remember the merge points. > > What went wrong here? ok, we had tr

Re: make DESTDIR=... install

2005-04-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 11:37:57AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Thanks Torsten. Hopefully this was the last thing lost in the merging of the rename branch, which was promised to just work. yeah, well, I'm sorry about that. I did the best I cou

Re: make DESTDIR=... install

2005-04-21 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 11:37:57AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: > Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > >Stas Bekman wrote: > >>Thanks Torsten. Hopefully this was the last thing lost in the merging of > >>the rename branch, which was promised to just work. > > > >yeah, well, I'm sorry about that. I did the bes

Re: make DESTDIR=... install

2005-04-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Torsten Foertsch wrote: Hi, installing into a separate directory via "make DESTDIR=... install" does not work with RC5. The attached patch cures that. Thanks Torsten. Hopefully this was the last thing lost in the merging of the rename branch, which was promised to

Re: make DESTDIR=... install

2005-04-20 Thread Geoffrey Young
>> yeah, well, I'm sorry about that. I did the best I could. > > > We know that Geoff. I wasn't talking about you, but the promise that svn > will just do the right thing. Apparently it quite sucks at automatic > merging and is too error-prone. :) --Geoff

Re: make DESTDIR=... install

2005-04-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Torsten Foertsch wrote: Hi, installing into a separate directory via "make DESTDIR=... install" does not work with RC5. The attached patch cures that. Thanks Torsten. Hopefully this was the last thing lost in the merging of the rename branch,

Re: make DESTDIR=... install

2005-04-20 Thread Geoffrey Young
Stas Bekman wrote: > Torsten Foertsch wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> installing into a separate directory via "make DESTDIR=... install" >> does not work with RC5. >> >> The attached patch cures that. > > > Thanks Torsten. Hopefully this

Re: make DESTDIR=... install

2005-04-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Torsten Foertsch wrote: Hi, installing into a separate directory via "make DESTDIR=... install" does not work with RC5. The attached patch cures that. Thanks Torsten. Hopefully this was the last thing lost in the merging of the rename branch, which was promised to just work. At the

make DESTDIR=... install

2005-04-20 Thread Torsten Foertsch
Hi, installing into a separate directory via "make DESTDIR=... install" does not work with RC5. The attached patch cures that. Another installation target "install_vendor" does not work at all. Distributors like Suse/Novell used to use this target for making RPM packages