On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> i like the idea, the pdf output i've seen from your modules is really
> slick! before moving forward, i think we should consider creating a
> modperl-2.0-docs repository, similar to what httpd does, splitting up its
> docs and code. the mod_perl-2.0
>> i like the idea, the pdf output i've seen from your modules is really
>> slick! before moving forward, i think we should consider creating a
>> modperl-2.0-docs repository, similar to what httpd does,
>> splitting up its
>> docs and code. the mod_perl-2.0 dist can include the docs
>> (or subs
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 9:32 PM
> To: Stas Bekman
> Cc: modperl-2.0 dev-list
> Subject: Re: mod_perl 2.0 documentation converters
>
>
> i like the idea, the pdf output i&#
i like the idea, the pdf output i've seen from your modules is really
slick! before moving forward, i think we should consider creating a
modperl-2.0-docs repository, similar to what httpd does, splitting up its
docs and code. the mod_perl-2.0 dist can include the docs (or subset of),
but a sepe
Hey, gang
I was wondering whether we want to have a base for converting mod_perl
core pods into other formats (ps,pdf,html,xml?), just like we have for the
guide.
http://perl.apache.org/~sbekman/doc.tgz is a drop-in replacement for ./pod
directory in mod_perl-2.0 cvs tree.
Assuming that you hav
