Re: mod_perl survey

2008-07-30 Thread Fred Moyer
Frank Wiles wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:47:05 -0700 Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The mod_perl survey has hit 295 responses as of today. A fairly respectable showing considering we didn't put a whole lot of effort into getting it out there. Was thinking about sending

Re: mod_perl survey

2008-07-30 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Frank Wiles wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:47:05 -0700 Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The mod_perl survey has hit 295 responses as of today. A fairly respectable showing considering we didn't put a whole lot of effort into getting it out there. Have you linked

Re: mod_perl survey

2008-07-30 Thread Frank Wiles
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:47:05 -0700 Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The mod_perl survey has hit 295 responses as of today. A fairly > respectable showing considering we didn't put a whole lot of effort > into getting it out there. > > Was thinking about sending

mod_perl survey

2008-07-29 Thread Fred Moyer
The mod_perl survey has hit 295 responses as of today. A fairly respectable showing considering we didn't put a whole lot of effort into getting it out there. Was thinking about sending an email to the main list asking them to forward the survey to their local .pm groups. Any other tho

Re: mod_perl survey

2008-06-21 Thread Fred Moyer
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Fred Moyer wrote: I think in Q5 it could be interesting if there is some interest in using the event MPM with mp. Technically you used it, so we'll have at least one person checking the event checkbox :) At one point I used it, in my consulting business in producti

Re: mod_perl survey

2008-06-21 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Fred Moyer wrote: I think in Q5 it could be interesting if there is some interest in using the event MPM with mp. At one point I used it, in my consulting business in production, but that didn't turn out so well after about 8 months, it mysteriously crapped out and I fell back to prefork. Als

Re: mod_perl survey

2008-06-21 Thread Fred Moyer
Torsten Foertsch wrote: On Fri 20 Jun 2008, Fred Moyer wrote: You forgot to ask about the 2 perl connection handlers. Can you suggest additional answer items for that question? I mean you ask about PerlResponseHandler, PerlTranslationHandler etc. You ask about all handlers of the HTTP respon

Re: mod_perl survey

2008-06-21 Thread Torsten Foertsch
On Fri 20 Jun 2008, Fred Moyer wrote: > > You forgot to ask about the 2 perl connection handlers. > > Can you suggest additional answer items for that question? I mean you ask about PerlResponseHandler, PerlTranslationHandler etc. You ask about all handlers of the HTTP response cycle. But with mp

Re: mod_perl survey

2008-06-20 Thread Fred Moyer
Torsten Foertsch wrote: On Fri 20 Jun 2008, Fred Moyer wrote: I'm interested on what thoughts other devs have on sending this out to the list. I have answered all your questions. Point 10 is really 3 questions. We only get 10 questions with the free survey, so I bundled three essay questio

Re: mod_perl survey

2008-06-20 Thread Torsten Foertsch
On Fri 20 Jun 2008, Fred Moyer wrote: > I'm interested on what thoughts other devs have on sending this out to > the list. I have answered all your questions. Point 10 is really 3 questions. You forgot to ask about the 2 perl connection handlers. Torsten -- Need professional mod_perl support?

mod_perl survey

2008-06-20 Thread Fred Moyer
Greetings, At the impromptu mod_perl BOF at YAPC::NA, Adam Prime had the great idea that a mod_perl survey could help look at the current needs of mod_perl users, similar to the Perl survey (http://perlsurvey.org). We hacked out a 10 question survey using surveymonkey.com, the link is here