On Thu, 17 May 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> you mean that when 2.0 sees PerlModule it just checks to see if it's valid
> then (later) perl checks for the module in @INC,
> whereas 1.3 does all this as it happens? Same for (yet to be implemented?)
> custom directives?
well, there is no PerlMod
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:47 AM
> To: Geoffrey Young
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: more Apache::Test stuff...
>
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> these patches seem to solve the problem by moving PerlRequire (and
> PerlSwitches?) to the preamble, thus insuring that @INC is modified before
> seeing any extra configuration stuff...
only problem is the patch causes pretty much all of 2.0's test t
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 11:23 PM
> To: Geoffrey Young
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: more Apache::Test stuff...
>
[snip]
> they are supposed to be in t/conf/mod
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> it works fine against 1.3 mod_perl. I've been writing a test suite for
> Apache::Dispatch consisting of a few different and the like.
cool.
> The only problem I was having was that I had to put
> use lib qw(../blib/lib ../blib/arch);
> in my modpe
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> I think I came off wrong... I may have meant "any time soon" :) certainly,
> even after it's release, it will take a while for it to catch on - I
> originally started off trying to run test.pl if the EU didn't have
> Apache::Test and t/* if the user
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 5:27 PM
> To: Geoffrey Young
> Cc: 'barries'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: more Apache::Test stuff...
>
>
> On Fri, 11 May 2001, G
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> none, but based on previous list discussions I didn't expect it to separate
> from 2.0 cvs. I'm happy to see it move to CPAN, though...
i've said all along Apache-Test was designed to be self-contained for
exactly this reason. it will stay as-is in
> -Original Message-
> From: barries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:11 AM
> To: Geoffrey Young
> Cc: 'Doug MacEachern'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: more Apache::Test stuff...
>
>
> On Fri, May 11,
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 07:45:55AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> > sub MY::test {
> > return Apache::TestMM->test if eval { require Apache::TestMM };
> >
> > return <<'EOF';
> > test:
> > @echo This test suite requires Apache::Test
> > @echo available from the mod_perl
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 11:11 PM
> To: Geoffrey Young
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: more Apache::Test stuff...
>
>
[snip]
>
> > sub MY::test {
>
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> hi again...
>
> ok, I've been working on a way to make a proper Makefile.PL that warns at
> 'make test' if you don't have Apache::Test installed.
>
> it's probably my meager understanding of ExtUtils and make, but this is
> all I could find that
hi again...
ok, I've been working on a way to make a proper Makefile.PL that warns at
'make test' if you don't have Apache::Test installed.
it's probably my meager understanding of ExtUtils and make, but this is
all I could find that worked:
eval {
require Apache::TestMM;
Apache::TestMM
13 matches
Mail list logo
